LogFAQs > #957642431

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 378: My name is FD(A), and I Approve this Topic.
Inviso 09/01/21 2:33:07 PM #127:	Forceful_Dragon posted... This doesn't feel like a real point to make. You are expecting a 2,000 year old collection of stories to address life before birth? I'm sure at that time many children died during birth and it didn't warrant any special mention because that's just the way it was. The argument is "thou shall not kill", which objectively IS in the bible. But it takes you to subjective areas like "what is alive" and "when does life begin". Which, yes, is not directly addressed in the bible, but it's lack of inclusion is not the gacha that you seem to think it is. The bible also didn't specifically address whether Blu-Ray or HD DVDs was superior, but why would it have? The main argument against abortion is supposed to be biblical and faith-based. But the Bible specifically refers to unborn fetuses as property, rather than people, when determining the punishment for their destruction. An altercation that results in the destruction of an unborn fetus is considered worthy of a monetary fine for destruction of property, whereas the death of the mother is considered murder, and warrants the death penalty. As usual, people like to cite the Bible as justification for their regressive beliefs, but they haven't actually read it. So they just get told that "abortion bad" and demonize anyone who either gets and abortion, or supports the practice. It's a lot easier to hate your opponent if you're able to label them all as monsters and murderers. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:957642431] in Politics C... [t:79627991]...</cite> <quote>Forceful_Dragon posted... </cite> <quote>This doesn't feel like a real point to make. You are expecting a 2,000 year old collection of stories to address life before birth? I'm sure at that time many children died during birth and it didn't warrant any special mention because that's just the way it was. The argument is "thou shall not kill", which objectively IS in the bible. But it takes you to subjective areas like "what is alive" and "when does life begin". Which, yes, is not directly addressed in the bible, but it's lack of inclusion is not the gacha that you seem to think it is. The bible also didn't specifically address whether Blu-Ray or HD DVDs was superior, but why would it have?</quote> The main argument against abortion is supposed to be biblical and faith-based. But the Bible specifically refers to unborn fetuses as property, rather than people, when determining the punishment for their destruction. An altercation that results in the destruction of an unborn fetus is considered worthy of a monetary fine for destruction of property, whereas the death of the mother is considered murder, and warrants the death penalty. As usual, people like to cite the Bible as justification for their regressive beliefs, but they haven't actually read it. So they just get told that "abortion bad" and demonize anyone who either gets and abortion, or supports the practice. It's a lot easier to hate your opponent if you're able to label them all as monsters and murderers. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1