hombad46 posted...Yeah that was definitely the hardest cross-examination in the game for me. I also interpreted her pause before the cause of death to mean that the statement about the cause of death is what I should be focusing on, which didn't help.
The actual reasoning was wrong but I got it on the first try because
she gives you two different amendments to her testimony so you know it's one of those. I actually thought that he'd died from the neck trauma but I figured she's lying about where she stabbed Odie Asman. For some reason I thought the lie was that she actually stabbed him at the crystal tower. So when asked what the problem was with the image I picked the broken glass. When that failed, the stab wound was the only other option.So I had an easy time with it despite completely getting the reasoning wrong.
I feel 2-5 had a harder one with the whole
Grouse thing was not listed in any of the descriptions of the evidence. You could only
see it if you examine the back of Mikotoba's invitation which I already did when I was first shown it, seemed completely irrelevant by now, and since it was technically a new case even though you first get it in 2-4 you can't normally text skip all the evidence you've already read so I didn't want to reread all the old evidence plus I figured they'd already have written anything significant in updated descriptions.---
</topic>
... Copied to Clipboard!