LogFAQs > #957084867

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topiclol i'm warned again
ReturnOfFa
08/14/21 3:40:09 PM
#49:


Zeus posted...
Overlooking the "wild" part (which isn't a thing), all he did was describe puberty. Are you disputing the idea of puberty?
No sir, I do not need to dispute puberty in order to be able to dispute the 12-year old body being 'ready' for pregnancy. Defining a 12-year old as 'ready' for pregnancy ignores reality - that not all 12 - year olds will even be able to conceive (you mention puberty, have all girls had their period by 12???? likely most but not all by far + that is not the only thing that prepares the female reproductive system to be able to bear a child). Besides that, they are nowhere near the optimum level of development to carry a child. Do you or anyone seriously think that a 12-year old's body is ready to bear a child? Besides the physical limits here, we're also going to completely ignore the psychological limits? Oh, and also the most problematic part that most people seem to take issue with - impregnating a 12 year old? That's why everyone is so pissed off and grossed out. I decided to go into some mind-numbing detail because Sunny won't, because he's a coward.

---
girls like my fa
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1