LogFAQs > #956683774

Machete posted...

Someone would say something, anything at all, and he would respond:

"This is like <wwe event> when <wwe person/people> <describes circumstances of wwe event for many paragraphs in massive wall of text the way a wwe commentator or promoter would do>"

The best part was that the wwe stories always did have contextual significance and relevance to whatever random thing it was in response to. Like... you could make it a game and try to stump him by posting shit that you didn't think he could relate to wwe in any way, just to see if/how he could. He would win every time.

Thanks (and to the others that answered), that does sound pretty fun lol

I tried tagging him but no luck

Doe posted...

I voted shab

ayyy

I once talked about my hair in a topic and WWE posted a 10/10 response about being yourself involving wrestlers.

nice, that sounds sweet

---

"If you wanna grow your business you need to exploit more." ~Austin_Era_II
"Out of those two? Racist for me... easily." ~Vicious_Dios