LogFAQs > #956421264

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Plums 52 favorite Magic cards
masterplum 07/24/21 3:18:04 PM #30:	Alanna82 posted... The fact that lava axe is bad shows how power creep is. I haven't played magic since around 2000 and I remember liking Lava Axe. (Isn't it basically the equivalent of a 5 damage fireball? 5 damage for 5 mana was acceptable back then. ) I like homelands cards because they tried to fight power creep with that set because people complained all the good cards cost money (like most of the Alpha power cards they dropped.) Then people complained it was too weak. I like close long drawn out games. Not games that rely on one combo to win in two turns. You would like limited then, lots of creatures and creature removal. Honestly it wouldnt surprise me if lava axe was bad in 2000. Not being able to kill creatures is just too big of a detriment --- https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdWiElvIQAAQpBt.jpg <cite>masterplum posted [p:956421264] in Plums 52 f... [t:79580750]...</cite> <quote>Alanna82 posted... </cite> <quote>The fact that lava axe is bad shows how power creep is. I haven't played magic since around 2000 and I remember liking Lava Axe. (Isn't it basically the equivalent of a 5 damage fireball? 5 damage for 5 mana was acceptable back then. ) I like homelands cards because they tried to fight power creep with that set because people complained all the good cards cost money (like most of the Alpha power cards they dropped.) Then people complained it was too weak. I like close long drawn out games. Not games that rely on one combo to win in two turns.</quote> You would like limited then, lots of creatures and creature removal. Honestly it wouldnt surprise me if lava axe was bad in 2000. Not being able to kill creatures is just too big of a detriment --- https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdWiElvIQAAQpBt.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1