LogFAQs > #956301910

Zeus posted...

...the implication being that people should support it when they don't believe a person is guilty? >_> Either way, no, we have a fucking legal system. And much -- if not most -- of the time, the thing turns out to not be true anyway?

And just within the last week or two you had some guy murdered on the street as the result of a wrongful accusation.

Except it would be surprising, considering none of the priors had anything to do with that. If somebody is sloppy enough to get 24 priors, they're a shitty criminal so it seems unlikely they just go away with it. The people who do get discovered as prolific pedos are generally people with *no* priors (or at least related priors).

Was the first thing I was thinking, tbh.

That's a shitty assumption that amounts to taking a murderer at his word. If the killer believed the claims, he had an opportunity to involve the law and then an opportunity to make his case to the public. He did neither.

Unless there's some extenuating circumstance, it just seems like straight-up murder.

No I'm saying any of us regular people making assumptions is stupid. All we know is someone is dead and had shit written on him by who was likely his killer. I'm saying we cant assume he was or wasnt a pedo. Until the killer is caught we won't really have more facts than that and still might not when/if he gets captured.

And him being a pedo or not doesnt justify the murder anyways. Just will make some of less sympathetic to the case.

---

Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!"