LogFAQs > #955305624

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Super Mario Bros. (1) vs. Super Mario 64: Which game aged the worst?
FortuneCookie 06/22/21 10:34:04 AM #13:	Super Mario 64 Even when it was new, the magic of Super Mario 64 wore off about two-thirds of the way through the game. The more you complete obstacles, the more missions are just "find the random coins / rings / numbers." You can also see, with the benefit of hindsight, that much of it was empty cubed spaces with the occasional spherical enemy. It's still a great game, especially if you stick to the better levels/missions and go straight for Bowser once you have 70 stars, but trying to 100% the game becomes a chore. Super Mario Bros. has variety and a kinetic energy about it which never lets up. You could play every level from start to finish and never grow bored. <cite>FortuneCookie posted [p:955305624] in Super Mari... [t:79527479]...</cite> <quote>Super Mario 64 Even when it was new, the magic of Super Mario 64 wore off about two-thirds of the way through the game. The more you complete obstacles, the more missions are just "find the random coins / rings / numbers." You can also see, with the benefit of hindsight, that much of it was empty cubed spaces with the occasional spherical enemy. It's still a great game, especially if you stick to the better levels/missions and go straight for Bowser once you have 70 stars, but trying to 100% the game becomes a chore. Super Mario Bros. has variety and a kinetic energy about it which never lets up. You could play every level from start to finish and never grow bored. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1