LogFAQs > #955304666

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Super Mario Bros. (1) vs. Super Mario 64: Which game aged the worst?
Tom Clark 06/22/21 9:55:51 AM #4:	Honestly, I'd say 64. The 3D action (and camera) has been refined and improved upon massively over the last few decades, whereas the side-scrolling action of the original - while lacking in the number of available moves - is at heart not noticeably more "old-fashioned" than any 2D platformer today. Basically, on a gameplay/mechanical level there was less in the original game to go wrong or be bettered, so it has weathered the storm more. Edit: 64 is still a cracking game, though, I'm not slagging it off. --- https://imgur.com/6eF0W <cite>Tom Clark posted [p:955304666] in Super Mari... [t:79527479]...</cite> <quote>Honestly, I'd say 64. The 3D action (and camera) has been refined and improved upon massively over the last few decades, whereas the side-scrolling action of the original - while lacking in the number of available moves - is at heart not noticeably more "old-fashioned" than any 2D platformer today. Basically, on a gameplay/mechanical level there was less in the original game to go wrong or be bettered, so it has weathered the storm more. Edit: 64 is still a cracking game, though, I'm not slagging it off. --- https://imgur.com/6eF0W</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1