LogFAQs > #955184114

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhat if Hitler and Nazi Germany succeeded in WWII?
Xavier_On_High
06/18/21 8:23:38 PM
#36:


UnfairRepresent posted...
This is just not true,

If the Battle of Britain had continued, the UK would have fallen years before Germany's economy collasped.

Your view of Britain is irrelevant, your view of history is wrong.

It ramped up production because aircraft was needed to save the nation. Their plane reproduction was still slower than Germany's and their supplies to build planes was desperate, the planes were building were of lesser and lesser quality.

They ONLY succeeded because of the combination of Germany's piss poor intelligence, terrible leadership and 2 front war. The UK was not only losing the battle of attrition, it was on the verge of losing completely

That's not praise or condemation of the UK or Germany. It's just what happened. The idea that the "UK curbstomped Germany and would have been fine fighting for years until Germany collasped!" is just pure nonsense fiction

Go to the RAF museum. Talk to historians and experts. Your view of history is utterly warped. The UK was desperate

I know you're a contrarian by nature, but you're just entirely wrong. I don't know if you get all your info from The World At War, but the modern consensus is that Britain, though not in a comfortable position, was never even close to defeat after 1941.

As for visiting a museum, I was born and raised in Portsmouth, I've literally been surrounded by military history my entire life and I've been on multiple trips to the RAF museum in London, which frankly doesn't support your claims.

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1