LogFAQs > #954553360

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Controversial Opinion #4: Automation
darkknight109 06/02/21 5:48:04 AM #270:	LinkPizza posted... And I'm only at work for so long. And do other stuff while I'm there like watching a show with my buddy, or paying a game with him. Doesn't sound like much of a job to me if that's how you spend your time. You sure you want to be criticizing my work when you're freely admitting that you're basically goofing off on company time? LinkPizza posted... And I trust myself and certain friends/family members more than AI. Sure, because you don't understand how statistics work. I get it. LinkPizza posted... Also, AI can have faults. True, just not as many or as egregious as humans. I've never said AI were perfect - that was your argument - I just said they're better than we are. And that is unarguably true. Basic statistics says so. LinkPizza posted... I shouldn't be forced to put my hand in the life of a machine (or hacker). You already do on a daily basis, because AI is all around you, whether or not you see it. Hell, all the planes in the sky above you are flying half-automated already. LinkPizza posted... And only a tyrannical government would drive regular safe driving, which many humans can do. Another nonsensical sentence. Were you maybe imbibing of something a little harder than coffee at work while you were writing this post? LinkPizza posted... And driving without a seatbelt is bad because it's safety issue. 99% of the time if you drive without a seatbelt, you will arrive at your destination with no ill effects; we've still banned it because it's unsafe. 99% of the time if you drive with a decent human driver, you will arrive at your destination with no ill effects; when self-driving cars eventually become common, this will eventually be viewed the same way as driving without a seatbelt. LinkPizza posted... People should be able to choose. Just like people can choose to eat healthy, or eat junk food. Or people can choose to work a safe or dangerous job. People don't have the right to drive without a seatbelt. Or drive drunk. Or ignore PPE requirements on hazardous jobsites. We do mandate safety and we will eventually mandate self-driving cars for the exact same reasons. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:954553360] in Controvers... [t:79384298]...</cite> <quote> LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>And I'm only at work for so long. And do other stuff while I'm there like watching a show with my buddy, or paying a game with him.</quote>Doesn't sound like much of a job to me if that's how you spend your time. You sure you want to be criticizing my work when you're freely admitting that you're basically goofing off on company time? LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>And I trust myself and certain friends/family members more than AI.</quote>Sure, because you don't understand how statistics work. I get it. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Also, AI can have faults.</quote>True, just not as many or as egregious as humans. I've never said AI were perfect - that was your argument - I just said they're better than we are. And that is unarguably true. Basic statistics says so. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>I shouldn't be forced to put my hand in the life of a machine (or hacker).</quote>You already do on a daily basis, because AI is all around you, whether or not you see it. Hell, all the planes in the sky above you are flying half-automated already. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>And only a tyrannical government would drive regular safe driving, which many humans can do.</quote>Another nonsensical sentence. Were you maybe imbibing of something a little harder than coffee at work while you were writing this post? LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>And driving without a seatbelt is bad because it's safety issue.</quote>99% of the time if you drive without a seatbelt, you will arrive at your destination with no ill effects; we've still banned it because it's unsafe. 99% of the time if you drive with a decent human driver, you will arrive at your destination with no ill effects; when self-driving cars eventually become common, this will eventually be viewed the same way as driving without a seatbelt. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>People should be able to choose. Just like people can choose to eat healthy, or eat junk food. Or people can choose to work a safe or dangerous job.</quote>People don't have the right to drive without a seatbelt. Or drive drunk. Or ignore PPE requirements on hazardous jobsites. We do mandate safety and we will eventually mandate self-driving cars for the exact same reasons. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1