LogFAQs > #954419807

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicControversial Opinion #4: Automation
LinkPizza
05/29/21 3:28:37 AM
#237:


And again, because it hasn't happened yet, nobody can literally know if it'll be worse that with humans. Or that they will definitely be safer or more predictable. We can only know that after hey come out... You can say they will be better all you want. We still don't have any proof that they actually will be better... or if it'll be better at avoiding anything... As I said earlier, we don't what will happen when there are a bunch on the road. Mayhem could break loose as soon as too many, or even just a lot, are on the road... Hackers could have a field day and cause all kinds of stuff to happen. And we can't know how it'll be until they are all on the road with the regular human drivers. Like I said earlier, an actual article said that experts warned that self-driving cars were "particularly susceptible" to hacking. And their view can still be obstructed in more than one place at the same time. Meaning they still might not see the car that caused the chain reaction. So, if the cars that were in the accident were in the far left lane and didn't the car in the far right lane that caused the chain reaction, they it becomes hard to actually pin the accident on them. If they were multiple lanes over with cars between them, then the cars in the accident might not see the person that caused the chain reaction. And since witnesses don't have to wait at the scene of an accident, they may not ever catch the other person... And since the one that start the chain reaction wasn't in an accident, it probably won't stop. All it knows is it almost had an accident and avoided it... And I would hope it avoids it, but I don't think self-driving cars are, which you seem to think based on something you said a little earlier... But, as stated above, the robots don't have to be perfect with some stuff. Stuff they can do over, which I listed earlier. A car accident isn't one of those things, though. So, for driving, it has to be perfect.. And it can't be that perfect, which is a reason I don't trust them and wouldn't get into one... Because I don't want to be the person who dies because of self-driving vehicles. You can say how low the chances are, but my driving also hasn't gotten me killed, so there's no different to me except I have no control over my own life anymore. Which is why I'm not getting in one. I rather take as much control of my own life as I can...

And I can't prove it until I find the topic. I just know that's what brought our conversation on. You said that, and I said how I worked at bus station that didn't have them. You said we'd be getting them soon. Within a couple of years. You want to be a petty liar and pretend you didn't say it, go ahead. I can't stop you. I'll just know you'll lie to get yourself out of a corner. And trust me, my memory is much better than yours. You can't even seem to remember your own post from a week or two ago in this very topic. So, it' definitely better. And you complain about me "misrepresented things" when that's literally what you've been doing this whole time. Like taking my quotes out of context and shit. Like about every time you post. I'd trust my memory over a person who can't even remember their own posts from a week ago. As for the government, they're the ones who make the law. They can easily find the loopholes. You're making this way too easy...
---
Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1