LogFAQs > #954419806

As for the "interpretation" you're confused about, we about to talk about it... Why you don't know confuses me, though. Since A, B, and C all deal with it, but whatever...

A.) If you live somewhere where you won't get business, then maybe the business isn't a good idea. If I lived in the middle of nowhere and wanted to start a business, I have to either move, or possibly rent out a place where I can get more customers. You right that most people aren't thinking to maximized their profits. But that's not really good business sense, either...

B.) I guess. When my mom started any of her businesses, it wasn't a main thing, either. But she did set out to make sure it was thriving. It helped to live more comfortably, even though we were living pretty comfortable already... Though, not rich or anything...

C.) Normally it is, though. With a business, you normally offer a product or service for money. Therefore, a major part of business is money. Especially since I think most business ideas have already been thought of and are available. You could also offer a closer version of whatever it is (like if someone opened a closer barbershop). But even then, they are usually trying to make money... My mom was a business owner, though. And even she agrees that the main point of a business is to make money. So, even a business owner disagrees. So, I don't think it has anything to do with being a business owner... I never said better equipment would definitely improve your business, because I don't know what your business is. So I did not make any wild assumptions. I based my assumptions on what you told me, though. And I've already explained why I made each assumption... And my mom taught me well enough. Probably better than you. At least her businesses were thriving and never bare minimum profits...

And no, I'm still not constraining anything. Here are some things I said:

- "While self-checkouts may not be plentiful in the junkyard, many cars are. So, it still doesn't really work. I can actually go to a junkyard and and probably find cars parts for used stuff. I could probably build a car with junkyard parts. But I probably couldn't make a self-checkout machine."(Post #139 fifth paragraph)

That's me saying how I could build a car from junkyard parts, but not a self-checkout.

- "Maybe some people could make one. But I don't think all the parts are all there. So, I still doubt it. Like advanced scanners and such."(Post #148 first paragraph)

That's me saying how I don't think all the parts to make on are in the junkyard.

So, no. I'm not adding constraints. I was always talking about building one from junkyard parts... That's was my whole point when talking about the junkyard specifically. Because I was talking about get cheap fixes financially. I never mentioned a car catalogue, so the electronics catalogue never mattered... So, again, you're just mad that you "lost the debate". No extra constraints needed. You just thought you could bring in electronics catalogue when the discussion of that paragraph was always about building a junkyard self-checkout. I know you can build on from parts from catalogues. So, that obviously wasn't what I was talking about...

As for the scenario, it could easily happen. I don't see how anyone could think otherwise... It's literally something that can happen. That's just a fact... Unless you think self-driving cars are perfect and can dodge literally everything... And you can nitpick all you want, but I'm obviously talking about self-driving cars. It's literally what that whole paragraph is about. My post is easy enough to understand, though, as you were able to answer it. Surprising since you've had so much trouble with context clues in the past... Either way, I disagree. I think self-driving that you won't be able to avoid getting in one is at least a decade or two away. Especially since most people will probably keep the cars they already own. For convenience sake. Plus, they already own it in many cases... And I never said I was worried about babies lives or anything. I think they'll be fine because they are passengers. I said, "And I'm not actually worried about the babies. While the AI might not notice something you dropped in the car, it would probably tell you a passenger is in the vehicle. And most people wouldn't forget as you would have to program the daycare in the navigation system when ordering." Which also means you'd end up at the daycare before work as long as you programed it right... But nice trying to twist my words. But again, try harder. Or just be a decent person and stop taking what I say out of context. But whatever...

But I do think humans should be able to drive themselves. If it was as big of a problem as you say, they we wouldn't be able to drive now. I think it was about 0.7% of all car accidents at fatal. It's still a big amount of people, but only because they are so many accidents. We don't even know if the number of accidents will go down for self-driving cars because of the ability to hack them. It may get worse, for all we know... Which is why I'm talking about solving problems before they happen... Though, if they taught drivers how to be safer, maybe the accidents would go down. Either way, I still don't and won't trust them... And will drive my own self (with the exceptions of other human drivers I trust) until the day I die... And sorry. The actual sentence was, "So, how am I scuttling my own argument?" Because I actually brought proof and have even countered all your points. You just don't like the answers I've shown...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.