Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Controversial Opinion #4: Automation |
darkknight109 05/23/21 4:47:10 AM #207: | LinkPizza posted...That sounds like something the car rental company would probably want to know about for sanitary reasons, so you're really not helping your case here by saying that cameras shouldn't be in the car to see it. LinkPizza posted...So if they're dirty, send it in for cleaning (something the AI can do by itself) and charge the bill to whoever dirtied it. Problem solved. LinkPizza posted...Weird how some pretty smart people have made a successful business model with it then. You act like this is an idea that hasn't already been implemented. The only thing that separates this from current Car Share programs is the self-driving aspect of it. LinkPizza posted...Something that would be picked up by the car's cameras. You would also have a record of who got in the car (since they would need to identify themselves to order the car), making it pretty easy to track down the culprit. LinkPizza posted...Uber's entire business model is predicated on that. They literally have yet to turn a profit because their entire business is not designed to work with human drivers and is unprofitable when they're in the picture. They're basically laying the ground work and banking on self-driving cars taking over the leg work so that the money flows to them instead of the drivers. There's a reason why they're one of the biggest investors in self-driving cars despite not being a big tech firm. LinkPizza posted...You're worried about leaving a phone behind but not about a kid dying? Says a lot, man. LinkPizza posted...Again, Uber is banking on this happening within the next 10 years. Pretty sure I trust their opinion on it more than yours. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |