LogFAQs > #953768433

IronBornCorps posted...

Yeah, but you can say the same thing about someone who doesn't support BLM have bias towards the police. The whole idea behind a jury is that no single person can make the verdict, you need consensus with the rest of Jury for a clear verdict, which we got.

*edit*
if EVERY juror was at a BLM event, sure I see your point.

I'm pretty sure the goal is still to fill a jury completely with people that are seemingly unbiased toward the defendant as well as being mostly unaware of the event in question. I feel that both are highly unlikely, probably next to nonexistent, for a BLM protester

And I would also agree that bootlickers loyal to cops like dogs shouldn't be on the jury either