LogFAQs > #953534813

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicControversial Opinion #4: Automation
LinkPizza
05/04/21 5:27:49 AM
#160:


As for the bigger businesses, youre right thats why I see the self-checkouts there. You mentioned how they are the ones normally with the self-checkout lanes. My question that still hasnt been answered is why theyre arent more, though? They have 4 self-checkouts, which are always busy. And like a couple cashiers. Why not take a couple of those always empty lanes and turn them into more self-checkout lanes? You can get more customers through faster. Which may even tempt some people to buy more since they know the lines may move faster since there are more lanes. But they dont And why is that? As for the parts, Im talking about the junkyard. Youd probably need a wizard to conjure up the parts there. People are always getting stuff from the junkyard. But it may be a while before you get al the parts needed to make a whole self-checkout from junkyard parts It you can even find the parts. Car parts are usually easier to find for many reasons. But its most likely different for self-checkout parts. Oh. And I was talking about parts in the junkyard. Not ordering them Which should have been evident since I just mentioned building a car out of junkyard parts. So, It would make sense that I was probably talking about doing the same with the self-checkout machine And even then, if theyre some super specific part you need, you may not be able to order if its a super old part that they dont really make anymore

Obviously, theres not a video of my scenario because, as I told you before, self-driving cars arent common yet. For my scenario to happen, self-driving cars would have to be at least semi-common. Its like youre not even reading what I post. I even said earlier, For my scenario to happen, well have to wait a couple decades for self-driving cars to be common If they ever become common Since the whole main point of this accident is self-driving cars (possibly mixed with human drivers, as well). Because it cant happen without enough self-driving cars on the road in the same place. So, if they ever became common enough, that could easily happen. My accident is basically a car swerving to avoid one car, causing another to swerve to avoid it. You were acting like Im talking about ramping off a tow truck and falling onto another car. And I had trouble articulating it because its hard to explain without showing you for me. I like to explain it visually. But that's harder to do through post. Especially when I would have shown people differently in real life. Just like how some people are better teaching or learning a certain way. I did explain it somewhat clearly, but you made it seem like an accident by swerving cars was impossible or something. But literally, here's what I was trying to say what would happen. Car 1 swerves toward car 2 to avoid an accident. Then car 2 swerves to avoid an accident by swerving into car 3. Maybe car 3 can't swerve, or doesnt swerve and gets hit. But by now, car 1 may already be further ahead after getting back on track. Its really that simple. As for the human driver, it could be that they didnt notice a car swerving at them if they were car 3. It also could be a self-driving car that had nowhere to swerve instead of a human driver, though, which they might try to avoid, causing them to get hit. Some roads dont allow for swerving, either. Could be outcoming traffic on the other side. Or trees. But I did explain that in the post you quoted, so Idk why you asked Either way, its a very real, since cars already do swerve to avoid accidents. And I know it would cause an accident either way. It could be an all self-driving car accident. Who knows? A human driver is added because it could change how the self-driving cars act But they dont need to be there. And while humans cant telepathically talk, they could still notice and try to make adjustments, as well Cant say whether it would be worse or not since it could change depending on what happens, though. And thats if the camera sees it. Something could have been in the way between the cars when the license plate would have been visible. It could also be hard to make it the cars were both swerving. And its possible other cars dont stop to hand over their recording if they werent involved. That being said, I still think self-driving cars will try to avoid hitting another to find a safer solution. But usually, the safest solution isnt just to run into one. So, I think Im right when I say they will usually try to avoid hitting each other Also, when I said I have no proof that it hasnt happened, Im talking about the mysterious company building an AI. But based on your previous post, I can see how you may have thought I was saying something different But all it would take is for the AI to become self-aware to make a real-life Skynet And I have no idea what companies are doing with the AIs already built...

And sorry. The They probably easily can was for the humans can probably easily tell if another is falling asleep. Normally, I would have put that at the end of the sentence. I was probably distracted. And Im not quoting anymore unless it gets down to 14 quotes. I was going to say 7, but 14 isnt too bad. But Im not doing 43 quotes. I'm not even quoting and it's taking me multiple post just to reply (6 to reply to 7)... I dont have time like that. Or the energy, tbh Besides, some of them get added together like this. Eventually, some of them will end up talking about something similar. So, this makes it all better but back to the topic, the reason I say may for the camera is because it could end up getting like a lens flare or something. Like maybe the window has a glare from the angle the camera sees it, but can be seen easier by the driver of said car looking at another car with a sleepy driver. So, its not a known fact as the technology could end up not being better. Its all about thinking of things is reality instead of acting like technology is perfect. Because it isnt And if they dont focus, then they arent better. They need to actually focus on things sometimes. Or else what they need to see might become blurry Literally and figuratively So it actually might not notice a human sleeping where a human actually does It could easily happen. Especially on a bright sunny day
---
Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1