LogFAQs > #953534778

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicControversial Opinion #4: Automation
LinkPizza
05/04/21 5:24:51 AM
#157:


The reason Im using that tense is because not all of them are built yet. Obviously Just because some know how to program doesnt mean they are do. Or all will And I dont care if an AI could do it better. If I have to give it control, it better be perfect. Again, if its not, then why would I want to give up control to it. And the fact is, people are still currently employed in a field an AI can work in. And even after they start making AI, people will still be employed in those fields. Whether its because they have their own business in the field and dont want to give it up, or because people dont trust the AIs as much as they trust humans (because many dont). Not to mention the people that would still have to oversee all of them. And the fact that some companies might instead make AI that assist instead of replacing. Which would actually be fine as long people can keep their jobs And if you think driving will be banned anytime soon, youre delusional. Many people love driving and wont give it up just because a car can drive itself. And many others dont even trust self-driving cars. And many wont even have the money for them. If would be a long time before driving became banned. And even then, people would probably fight to keep driving. Besides, they already know people can hack the cars, making it dangerous to ride in them And they still havent found a solution yet. I heard theyre working on it. But still havent fix it, apparently And while speeding is breaking the law, most cops (unless trying to get their quota) wont care about 5-10 over. Which can make a big deal on certain trips. Like when I drive 24 hours to go home. Going the speed limit the whole time would have actually made our trip take a couple hours longer. It can even help slightly with running late or shorter trips. And campaigning for higher speed limits probably wont do much because of how they choose speed limits.

As for not owning them, most people probably wont actually like that. Making them less likely to become popular. Most people like to leave stuff in their car. Like I know a bunch of people who leave their top or hat inside. Or lunchbox. And people forget stuff in cars all the time. Which would suck. Especially if you phone was what you forgot. With a phone, you can usually contact the driver to make sure you got it back, if someone was with you. It might be harder to contact the car. Especially since you probably had to use an app to get it. Though, they could be said for Uber. Though, you could probably call back for a taxi. And if you call you phone, the Uber driver might hear it and bring it back. Where a self-driving car might not. People also like certain things in cars like bags and clothes or whatever. Especially when going somewhere. Like going out to eat after school, or going somewhere after work. Which is why I mentioned owning them. People are already fine with owning cars that are in their garage or driveway. So, telling people cars wont have to take up space on their property isnt even something many people would care about. And its not like anything like owning a car. Also, what youre describing is basically a taxi/Uber/Lyft/etc type of service. Which we already have, and many people dont use daily And people still own cars even though we have those. So, having this service probably won't be a deterrent for people wanting to own their own car. Many people buy and fix up cars (especially classic cars) not only because they like the car, but to drive it. And many arent going to only want to drive it to a specialty track or place. Many just like driving. Not only that, but many people might not leave exactly on time. Or forget stuff. And have to go back all the time. I literally wont ever ride in a self-driving car. 100%... And many people wouldnt want to pay a monthly/yearly/etc subscription to get a car to take them places when they could just drive themselves for less And while you can work on both, splitting the work like that slows down both. So, if they really want one to come out faster, they would put more effort on one or the other. And it would probably be electric, so its easier to make electric self-driving cars instead of having to redo them all Also, to add to what I said earlier, there are also people who live in weird areas. Like down dirt roads which arent on maps. Or arent on maps as roads. 3 examples off the top of my head would be my friend back home, my BF, and my co-worker. My friend back home lived down this dirt road that even pizza guys had trouble finding. And its not really marked on any map. Even MapQuest use to have trouble finding it. My boyfriend lives on this property where you come off a road onto this like tiny backroad, then have to drive through a fence in the dirt to get to his house. Not exactly anything on navigation. My phone highlights the road and tells me to get there when leaving. And my co-worker recently moved to this land. And not only does my phone not actually go onto the land to his house (or the area it will be in). It doesnt even go the full way there. It stops early. So, that would also suck
---
Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1