LogFAQs > #953534742

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicControversial Opinion #4: Automation
LinkPizza
05/04/21 5:21:46 AM
#156:


I would say that many. There are also people at local places that have their own special recipes. So super fancy places and local places. And even some of the restaurant chains have people who are better than some of their normal chefs. I think youre vastly underestimating how many local restaurants there are. Or how many of those special places there are. Or even how many chefs at chains will add their own special twist to the recipes. It changes more when you actually know how many chefs wont actually spill the beans on their special ingredient As for personal chefs, it depends. Its not always a rich person. Some people have friends or family members who will cook for them like that. It just depends on the person and their relationship. Like maybe a son cooks for his mom and other family members. Or someone cooks for their best friend who they have known since they were babies. And many husbands and wives may cook for each other if one is actually a good cook

Making the robots a network is actually a really bad idea. They can easily be hacked if on a network. Which actually makes the idea of robots even worse. Like a lot worse. As for fine tuning it, that might actually be pretty hard. Because not everyone knows how to describe what they want. AFAIK (according to what I read), tasting robots can only tasting what is in food. But they dont always know what you like more. You might say you want more of this or more of that, even though thats not what youre looking for. Happens to a lot of people. They may think they want more of one ingredient to get it to taste a certain way, but thats not correct because it makes a different taste when you add more. It might work for simple drinks. But not for ones with more ingredients. Not to mention, fine tuning usually only works when they order the same thing multiple times. Which may not always happen. Not to mention, some people go to different restaurants because of the way certain people make certain things. Having a robot make it means a make it could end up making everything taste the same, which is no fun Though it might be possible to make it so a robot cant use certain recipes outside of that restaurant But someone could also hack the robots, so And a hacked robot is no good...

I saw where you said better can be slower. But people dont want slower. They want faster. Most people already try to find the fastest way out already. And as I said earlier, Im not quoting because its too much. For example, youve sent like 7 post at once. And they equaled 43 different quotes. And Im not quoting all those and writing back to each one and sending them over the course of however long. Ill just write a big post. I only have so much free time Im willing to waste at work. And even then, dont act like youre a better quoter. Youve already taken a few of my quotes out of context by cutting them short. Or only taking a piece on certain quotes for whatever reason... You even do something simmilar close to the end of these quotes...

You say that its cost effective to get the new machines that are 10x cheaper, but that Wal-Mart and Target (who can definitely afford it) arent getting more because they cant afford it? Thats why I dont believe you. If it would save them money in the long run, theyd do it. They arent for a reason. I do have a few theories on why, but this is what Im saying. Youre saying they would be 10x cheaper. So, the stores that can afford should get them. Especially since bigger stores usually look for the most money, even over time. At the same time, youre saying my they arent, but have no real reason other than they cant afford them. But its hard to believe that Wal-Mart and Target dont have enough money...

And they are not personal anecdotes. Personal anecdote would be me telling a story that I think would relate to everyone. Like how when one person went to the doctor with certain symptoms, it was a certain disease. So I believe anyone with those symptoms have that disease. Or something like that. The people I talked to gave their opinion. Same as you and me. Though, it has more statistical value than what you said. As what you said makes no sense. Thinking everything will be free just because is pretty bad reasoning. And literally everyone knows it. Except for some people on this site like you... And while I know you gave your reasons, they're not actually good reasons. Because there's no way people just start giving stuff away for free just because their robots made it for them. That's not how it's ever worked. Whoever owns the robots not get way more profits. That's how it's going to work since that's how it always has worked...

You might be the one that should brush up on history instead. AI might be an idea, but it goes into something physical. Like a robot, computer, or technology or some kind. The problem is you think people will make things cheap and undercut a lot. Problem is, they still need to make money. Hence why gas stations only go so low even when their competitors are a little lower. Stores will only go so low, as they still want to make a profit. I mean, if other stores wanted to make prices lower, they would right now. The reason they dont is to make a profit. Maybe things get a little cheaper, but free is just a made up fantasy in your head. Even now, many things got cheaper to make over the years, but we still charge the same price for them as always. Because if its cheaper to make, you make more of a profit. Happens all the time... And people will buy the hell out of marked up shit. They do all the time. Especially if it carries a brand name... And AI will do whatever the owner tells them to do.

As for digital, people were pretty sure they would replace film for most people. And it actually probably helped their profits. Digital camera cost more. And they have to buy memories chips. Which were actually pretty expensive when they first came out. And people would still bring the digital cameras to the store to print stuff out. Still can these days, as well... Digital most likely got them more money. So, of course they would try to replace it... And I know the difference. Between currency and money. I wouldnt had written it like I did even I didnt know the difference. Im just sure the currency will be money, still
---
Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1