LogFAQs > #953270835

They cost money because everything has a price. Not just because humans gather them. Even when robots are gathering them, they will cost money. Its kind of like how when things get cheaper to make, the price for us to buy usually stay the same. Because they are looking for ways to make a bigger profit. Because thats what they care about Profit! Free is a nice thought, but one that will never come true Just like the vroombra. The reason they are free is because everything has a price. Those are probably made on an assembly line thats automated. It cost money because literally everything does. Whether humans work the factory or not, they will cost money. Things wont just become free. The most is maybe some stuff becomes cheaper. And even that might not actually happen And even then, stuff wouldnt be free until a lot more in automated. Because not everything will be automated at the same time. Meaning everything will still cost money until they get closer to full automation (which is like decades away). And because they will never reach full automation, things wont ever be free In the end, the materials arent just free because a robot harvested them. If that was true, the person who gets the materials wouldnt do it because he has no need to get them. You the disingenuous one if you really think things will be free for no reason. If they were true, many things would already be free. We have automated factory lines for many things already. And they cost money

As for the seed to dinner plate, are you saying its going to grow a full plate in the course of an hour while making dinner? And what about meat? And cheese? And where do you get the seeds? That would still cost money, as well You need materials, and materials are going to cost money. All that stuff cost money. You will still have to pay for it.

The point of the computer being able to predict moves is that its computer. Based on how someone is playing (or how they played before), they can usually make a good prediction. Especially since the computer might know if someone is playing aggressively, passively, offensively, or defensively And for video games, they do take from other games. But there are plenty trying to make original games. Or more original. And trying Though, sequels are pretty big. But I would at least know they are trying to make something new. Where AI seems like it would basically just mixed from what it has instead of making actual original. Like, Im not sure it would try to make something new Like with the videos it created for a few funny channels As for staying wonky, it depends. For humans, even if they try to fix it, there are always mods. Or they may fail to fix it. Or they dont actually fix it correctly. Though, a computer probably could. And most likely would As for games like goat simulator and deer simulator, they were made by humans, AFAIK Which were both weirdly original

Yeah. They do need to be watched. They arent perfect. But thats why I dont think mistakes will happen since theres no way a computer makes a game without any human interference in some way. Mainly because they have testers. And they have to pass them. I think any mistakes in the game they might make will be the visible ones. And since most game devs dont usually try to make mistakes, they would probably inform the AI, who would change it and eventually continue to look out for that specifically. But yeah. The AI wont release mistake riddled games because they will always have people check them. Of course, we have to see, though Though, most automation will require human supervision. Like all pretty much will

My entire purpose isnt my job. But thats where I go to talk to friends. And it gives me something to do during the day. Ive done the staying at home and not working. Even with multiple hobbies, life became very boring for me. It can work for a little while. But for the rest of your life, it would suck. I like work so I can talk to friends. And hang out and stuff. We even play games, watch shows, and read or whatever Hobbies only go so far not to mention costly Because money will still be needed for many hobbies (if not all) I couldnt even do the rest of my life starting today without being bored most of the time. If you can, good for you. But I dont that fits most people. I think people would be fine not working, but I also think theyd be very bored most of the time if has nothing to do with life changes. People like certain things. But doing something too much can cause that thing to become somewhat boring Like how people like to play different games instead of the same one forever and ever

I have my own opinions. But people who know about music were talking about that in videos. But that has no bearing on what I listen to myself. If someone who knows more about music is talking about the AI generated music, then I have no reason to doubt them on one video alone. When more people were saying the same thing, and many were someone who knew about music, it seemed like they were probably all right, and telling the truth. But that doesnt mean they tell me what to listen to. They are giving information on how the AI works/worked. Im not even sure if those videos gave recommendations on what to listen to It was informational about AI generated music They listen to the things that the music was based off of. I probably havent. And the point wasnt about it sounding good. It was when it sounded like a blatant rip-off by using the same patterns from somewhere else because of how it just sucks in and mixes info most of the time By replicating it, are you agreeing that they are just ripping off other music, then? And Amazon getting robots to stock shelves is bad because thats more jobs lost I dont see how that supports anything youre saying.

It sounds more like you dont know how to run a business (or a big one, at least). Especially if you were struggling to keep it going or make enough. Youre talking about a small business. Im talking about the bigger ones. The ones that actually have self-checkout machines and arent getting more. The ones you think will wait for cheaper ones. Businesses should absolutely get better ones. Getting older ones is just throwing away money. Small businesses may need some extra time (though 30 years seems like quite a bit of time). But thats if they even need self-checkout, which many dont for mom and pop style shops. But big businesses should always be thinking in the long run. And they usually have the money to do just that And honestly, maybe part of the problem was you werent thinking long term about it. You have to thinking both long and short term. You cant just thinking about one. Eventually, you may have to sacrifice something. But it should usually be the less riskier choice you choose. And that would mean that you should buy the newer models of self-checkout. For the stores that need them Especially when its place like Target or Wal-Mart who probably arent going anywhere any time soon And while they dont have infinite money, those giant corporations have the money to keep putting up building all over the place. They probably have access to more money than people trying to buy cars. Especially young people who can only get starter jobs as teenagers. They usually dont have enough for a new car. And may not get a job they are pretty sure they will keep that will pay enough.
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.