LogFAQs > #952885333

As for video games, the reason I dont think they would be is that theyll be taking data from other games to make games. Thats why I think that. Maybe (and thats a big maybe) they could have created something new and unique in the past. But even now, game developers can have a hard time making new and unique stuff. As for the glitches, they would normally be patched. Though, some games stay wonky, like physics is GTA V. But thats only if the computer would think that. But I dont actually think it would try to do that. I have no proof of this either way. But I dont think it would actually make mistakes. Or the mistakes would be as good Especially since it was never the game devs trying to make them (most of the time). They usually try to squash them. And I feel they would still have sort of quality control that would squash those if they were just out in the open. And would probably think the machine is malfunctioning. Maybe a game could make you feel that way, but Im still skeptical it could. Especially since they dont feel feelings. They just learn them. But I think learning about emotions and feeling them is different

But what else would there be to fill fulfilled in this imaginary automated world? You cant do anything because its all done for you? Theres nothing left to do except be bored and have no purpose. As for music, I listen to what I like to listen to. Some people dont even like the same stuff I listen to. I know dont where you got that people tell me what to listen to. I said I trust what they say about music, though. Like when talking about it. I personally dont know anything about you. And you could literally say anything you wanted. But the people online who talk about it are usually people who either have some sort of proof, or other videos that show they know what they are talking about. Or my BF. I trust him and know he knows about music his whole family is very music oriented And the problem is them replicating it

Apparently, Amazon is working on firing those people, as well. They are trying to teach robots to stock shelves in their stores. Like not just the warehouse, but the Amazon physical store. And then, they will probably sell that to other stores. And I thought it sounded like you wanted those people to be replaced, as well And as for the people needed to use the regular checkout, they still have some. They usually have like 20 (at wal-mart) while only manning like 4 (if that) Target is usually most space efficient. Though even before they had self-checkouts, they still had some empty spots (Though I think that was more due to the turnover rate) And Amazon already makes that. You take it from the store and scan you phone on the way out or whatever. Which means more jobs lost And you can already order whatever you want online. Its just you get a human instead of a robot most of the time. Id rather just go get it, though If Im being honest And I dont see anything that says that there are a bunch of parent companies. I said not all stores are big enough to have one. But many are. Not to mention the ones who have a parent company would probably have a parent company who could/would look into it for them

Businesses should absolutely have the luxury to worry about the long run. Thats just good business sense. Thats how you make money. In the end, cost effectiveness is better if you have to fix it less, and the parts are available and plentiful. Especially since itll probably cost more to keep replacing rather than buying the one that last twice as long Or even longer It would probably end up costing more to keep replacing it over and over instead of getting a good one

As for getting a used on instead of a new one, thats because people, unlike businesses, dont always have the money. Plus, certain cars can usually have more parts readily available. While self-checkouts may not be plentiful in the junkyard, many cars are. So, it still doesnt work. I can actually go to a junkyard and probably find car parts for used stuff. I probably could build a car with junkyard parts. But I probably couldnt make a self-checkout machine. Maybe not even a makeshift one So, those are different Thats why. And cheaper and fixable. But that doesnt go for self-checkout machines So, they should absolutely buy the best self-checkout machines. And for cars, either is fine Because those work very differently And while people may not be able to get loans, businesses usually can At least, the franchises can

Again though, thats in the same vehicle. And people may actually notice, and say something. Some people dont believe them. And so they probably wouldnt listen to the car either. But again, thats in the same car And thats if the other vehicle in autonomous. But at that point, whats the issue. It can just pull over if it was self-driving. But in the end, thats still in its own car. But humans can probably see inside other cars better. And probably more accurately

The aliens thing is to show how anything can happen. But its a very realistic situation. Whether you want to believe it or not. Or are you saying if a self-driving car move toward another, the other one wont move. Because if youre saying it wont move, then they suck. But if they would move out of the way, then my theory makes sense. All that needs to happen for my theory to make sense would be the self-driving car moving out of the way if another self-driving car was coming toward it from the side. Why are you acting like that is impossible. Especially in multi-lane roadways So, I mean, the only way my theory doesnt make sense is if self-driving cars will just allow cars to run into them from the side So, I guess thats what youre saying. Because if so, than they sound pretty shitty

And the reason it happened with AI yet is because there arent enough on the road. Theres still only a few of them. There would have to be quite a few for it to happen. And it has an especially high chance when the road is mixed with humans and self-driving. Once you have a bunch on the road at once, more things will most likely start to happen As for dying, Id rather die by a human instead of a machine. But I also rather be able to control it myself. And while the car may be good at driving, Id rather it not make decision to save someone else instead of me. I dont think the choice will happen much (hopefully), but Id probably be the one to die. Being older, and probably alone, in the car. And while Id be fine giving my life for some people, Id rather do it then let my car decide who gets to liveAnd yes. I would want them to be perfect. Otherwise, they seem like a waste to me

Sorry. I guess what you said was, Theres enough to talk about in this topic without dragging up a years-old discussion. But this is basically the same stuff we talked about then, as well. Only a few new pieces of info Its not four years old. It was like two. And I dont know the whole conversation. But I remember our long conversation. It lasted for a while then, IIRC I dont remember how many post, though. But it was long then, as well It had to be when I was at both the bus job and doing weekends on base where I ate at the DFAC. So, there was only a small span when it could have been I also remember talking to my boss about it

Its illegal to leave them out. But as long as you are thinking about them (or saying you are), it can delay things. How long they can delay it, Im not sure. But all those small buses dont seem to be handicap friendly, so somethings going on if theyre using a lot of those
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.