LogFAQs > #952793935

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Another day, another mass shooting
ReturnOfFa 04/13/21 3:55:27 PM #80:	BADoglick posted... You say you're in favor of pushing for more enlightened and accepting views, yet advocate for discrimination against those with mental illness. There seems to be some cognitive dissonance here, which is proven by your 'sO mAkE tHeM ' comment, because clearly you still can't wrap your head around the concept that gun laws ARE the discriminatory bills. It's not a separate topic. Connect your wires homie You're tying less simple gun-access to discriminating against the mentally ill. I'm sorry, but there's a huge range of whether or not your mental illness will effect your ability to access guns in countries with apparently "discriminatory" gun laws. Some people are going to pass their (far more comprehensive) gun exams in Canada, regardless of their mental conditions, and some won't. It's not discriminatory. It's based on comprehensive knowledge and the ability to demonstrate it. In the USA, it's demonstrating that you have $100 in your wallet and on you go with your day. Why do you have to add a dig at someone's intelligence every time you present a point? --- girls like my fa <cite>ReturnOfFa posted [p:952793935] in Another da... [t:79401940]...</cite> <quote>BADoglick posted... </cite> <quote>You say you're in favor of pushing for more enlightened and accepting views, yet advocate for discrimination against those with mental illness. There seems to be some cognitive dissonance here, which is proven by your 'sO mAkE tHeM ' comment, because clearly you still can't wrap your head around the concept that gun laws ARE the discriminatory bills. It's not a separate topic. Connect your wires homie</quote>You're tying less simple gun-access to discriminating against the mentally ill. I'm sorry, but there's a huge range of whether or not your mental illness will effect your ability to access guns in countries with apparently "discriminatory" gun laws. Some people are going to pass their (far more comprehensive) gun exams in Canada, regardless of their mental conditions, and some won't. It's not discriminatory. It's based on comprehensive knowledge and the ability to demonstrate it. In the USA, it's demonstrating that you have $100 in your wallet and on you go with your day. Why do you have to add a dig at someone's intelligence every time you present a point? --- girls like my fa</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1