LogFAQs > #952745727

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Avatar vs. The Force Awakens: Which movie has aged worse?
NFUN 04/12/21 10:51:33 AM #8:	redrocket posted... TFA was fine when it came out and is still fine now. Certain people are just starting to retroactively hate it because Disney fucked up the rest of the trilogy. TFA could have been a flawed, but perfectly serviceable start to a great trilogy. That we didnt get that is not the fault of the first movie. I've seen the phrase in a lot of contexts now. "perfectly serviceable" means nothing more than "not outright repulsive" --- Kneel... or you will be knelt <cite>NFUN posted [p:952745727] in Avatar vs.... [t:79401312]...</cite> <quote>redrocket posted...</cite> <quote>TFA was fine when it came out and is still fine now. Certain people are just starting to retroactively hate it because Disney fucked up the rest of the trilogy. TFA could have been a flawed, but perfectly serviceable start to a great trilogy. That we didnt get that is not the fault of the first movie. </quote> I've seen the phrase in a lot of contexts now. "perfectly serviceable" means nothing more than "not outright repulsive" --- Kneel... or you will be knelt</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1