LogFAQs > #949999313

g980 posted...

I think you are basing your opinion more on media representation of investment professionals than the reality.

running countless analyses of risk, performance attribution, fundamentals, and regulatory compliance doesn't make for a good movie but that is most of what they do. it's boring and it's all about gambling as little as possible (depending on your fund)

You miss my issue. It's that I don't think anyone, no matter how reasoned they go about it, should make more money just owing a stock in a successful company and selling later than people working for that company. It's not based on anything but seeing 30+ years of companies incentivizing improving stock prices no matter the long therm health of their companies, and then ignoring the other economic impacts.

---

I'm not saying that less toxic gaming journalists would lead to less toxic gamers. I'm just saying there's no proof to the contrary.