LogFAQs > #949565239

TheOtherMike posted...

You don't get to follow someone around their neighborhood in your truck, get out and chase them into a dark alley, refuse to identify yourself, reach for a concealed weapon, then claim "self-defense" when they act to defend themselves.

You guess wrong.

If you actually followed the case then how come you don't know basic facts about it, your details are wrong and curiously match the "details" of innaccurate facebook whining or CNN articles?

Zimmerman never "Chased anyone into a dark alley" and never "Reached for a concealed weapon" nor did Martin defend himself. Even "followed him around in a truck" is pushing reality to ludicrous degrees. He followed him for a matter of seconds while on the phone to police to report him after Martin was circling his car.

Martin got home. Turned around, went after Zimmerman, hid behind a bush, jumped out, sucker punched him, mounted him, punching his face so his head smashed into the sidewalk as Zimmerman begged for him to stop but Martin refused and blood poured into Zimmerman's eyes so he couldn't breathe or see.

There was no alley, no "refusal to identify self" , no pulling out a gun, Martin was the instigator and Zimmerman was on the phone to police close to the entire time. All of your details are simply incorrect.

Then Zimmerman reached for his gun and shot Martin

---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair!
https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob