LogFAQs > #947559283

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Belle Delphine topics moderated as censor bypassing
XIII_rocks 11/24/20 3:51:10 PM #127:	Mr Lasastryke posted... no, he didn't. go look up the wikipedia article about the site. at no point does it say it's a porn site. it has adult content on it, sure (the same goes for fucking youtube) but it's not a porn site. nice to see xic has become a typical "i have to defend every bullshit moderation" mod now. he'd fit right in on hellhole. I generally don't post in topics like this. I know for a fact I've actively avoided several over the last 18 months. You are taking an isolated incident in which you disagree and making an overarching character judgement. If somebody did this to you, you would cry foul about it for years. The site has determined that due to the high amount of adult content posted on that site it is an inappropriate thing to put on the boards. It is thus characterized here as essentially a "porn site", whether you agree that it should be or not. So to be clear, the moderation itself is a fair application of our current rules (apart from the fact the first one should have been offensive rather than censor bypass), in that it has been characterized as something that should be deleted. That is what I am defending specifically, and it's also why the examples Corrik posted have not been deleted. You can however argue that the rule itself is dumb and that particular site should be allowed. That's not a hill I'm particularly prepared to die on either way; if it was allowed, I'd be fine with that. That site is at least in a grey area as opposed to certain others, so I'm not against it or anything. And there is certainly scope for a warning before you post it so stuff like this doesn't happen. But as the rules currently stand it is a fair moderation, and notably different from the other examples Corrik posted. That has been basically my sole point in this topic. You're arguing something different, that the rule itself should change or that this site should be made an exception, which is a discussion I'm fairly ambivalent towards. --- Not to be confused with XIII_stones. https://imgur.com/agodP3r <cite>XIII_rocks posted [p:947559283] in Belle Delp... [t:79129377]...</cite> <quote>Mr Lasastryke posted...</cite> <quote>no, he didn't. go look up the wikipedia article about the site. at no point does it say it's a porn site. it has adult content on it, sure (the same goes for fucking youtube) but it's not a porn site. nice to see xic has become a typical "i have to defend every bullshit moderation" mod now. he'd fit right in on hellhole.</quote> I generally don't post in topics like this. I know for a fact I've actively avoided several over the last 18 months. You are taking an isolated incident in which you disagree and making an overarching character judgement. If somebody did this to you, you would cry foul about it for years. The site has determined that due to the high amount of adult content posted on that site it is an inappropriate thing to put on the boards. It is thus characterized here as essentially a "porn site", whether you agree that it should be or not. So to be clear, the moderation itself is a fair application of our current rules (apart from the fact the first one should have been offensive rather than censor bypass), in that it has been characterized as something that should be deleted. That is what I am defending specifically, and it's also why the examples Corrik posted have not been deleted. You can however argue that the rule itself is dumb and that particular site should be allowed. That's not a hill I'm particularly prepared to die on either way; if it was allowed, I'd be fine with that. That site is at least in a grey area as opposed to certain others, so I'm not against it or anything. And there is certainly scope for a warning before you post it so stuff like this doesn't happen. But as the rules currently stand it is a fair moderation, and notably different from the other examples Corrik posted. That has been basically my sole point in this topic. You're arguing something different, that the rule itself should change or that this site should be made an exception, which is a discussion I'm fairly ambivalent towards. --- Not to be confused with XIII_stones. https://imgur.com/agodP3r</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1