LogFAQs > #947525077

XIII_rocks posted...

He mentioned the name of a porn site so no, it's not, and it is in line with the usual policy. It's been determined by people above me to moderate mentions of that website in the same way we hit others.

well no, the video literally does not exist.
when i'm saying literally nothing i'm meaning literally nothing. this content does not exist. it has not been created. there is absolutely nothing of that content anywhere.

and curious, what's "the same way" others get hit. no snark there, actual question.
there isn't, and hasn't been, a problem with the news of Cardi B starting an onlyfans with her explicitly saying no, it's not for porn and there would be no 18+ content. same goes for Bella Thorne saying that or that she was doing it for a movie. or how WWE fired Zelina Vega for having an onlyfans and that was explicitly said so, by name, in a press statement. these are topics that have existed with no problem of the name. same goes for people who'll say the site's name as a joke. or, for an entirely different site that's decisively worse, what about when people talk about and show the picture of pornhub's annual search term by state? because that's been fine too and gets talked about on every social board. there's nobody linking to porn in any of these examples, though there is mention of the sites.

and what about name changes? is OF okay instead because the name technically isn't stated?
like if it's gonna be like this, then do what gets already done for certain words: tag it in the auto-"hey you sure you wanna post this" first.

---

"Maybe it's a tentacle, molesting the planet itself. - Aschen Brodel.