| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Ol Punny plays Ace Attorney: Investigations *SPOILERS* |
| Punnyz 11/20/20 5:11:40 PM #55: | I'm sure most people got it but let me clarify since I didn't do a good job at it We were supposed to be proving they did NOT know they were family while planning and committing the crime Yes, they were in cahoots obviously whether or not they were family or knew of it (which is what I said in the post) I do not remember why Lang brought this up and why it was important to prove they didn't know of their relation, but the game's curveball answer was just that there was a third person. THAT SOMEHOW disproves they did not know they were family according to the game It was such a weird angle to come from that I would've never saw it in a million years They could very well HAVE known of their relation AND STILL have a third guy to work with and Lang was completely speaking in hypotheticals (which pissed Edgeworth off because theres a lack of evidence and its all conjecture but Lang pointed out Edgeworth didn't have evidence either) So I paid NO attention to the fact he said "Those two" in a random testimony. I would've never thought that number was the problem. damn man It felt like trying to win an internet argument by pointing out a Grammar error. Its just some semantic bullshit. I almost wonder why Lang wasn't like "Oh my bad, THOSE THREE then" and went on. I feel like Edgeworth seriously had nothing on his hand --- ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |