LogFAQs > #946486767

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTucker Carlson lost only "evidence" of "Biden's corruption"
Wanded
10/30/20 3:34:58 AM
#132:


GunslingerGunsl posted...
Objective truth is debatable in certain situations. This is why people are capable of believing two opposing things. We all read the "evidence" differently. The trouble I have is wondering whether any media source, or entity (people, groups, and organizations) can really be free of political influence. Websites, for example are created by people, and people are fallible.
no media source is unbiased because they are run by people and people are biased, there are many kinds of bias that can exist in a media source, for instance one can report a man was shot dead and that would not be fake news as that is factual yet if the shooter is antifa who killed a trump supporter, that same report would then be biased for leaving out political information, another form of bias is simply not reporting something that goes against your bias, which consists the majority of bias in outlets

There is no objective news source, the only thing you can do is listen to both sides, a leftist outlet and a conservative outlet, and compare notes, do research, keep tabs on stories to see which side ended up right etc

i was actually just watching this which feels relevant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFRirpxqD8A

---
Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1