LogFAQs > #946471265

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Tucker Carlson lost only "evidence" of "Biden's corruption"
OhhhJa 10/29/20 7:09:59 PM #72:	GunslingerGunsl posted... Wouldn't media bias be a good reason to question the legitimacy of a source? I'm still confused as to how any one person can stand by their belief so strongly without at least considering whether or not they have any confirmation bias. I'm not discounting the possibility of the truth of all these claims, but I think the burden of truth lies on the side that is claiming the existence of something rather than the non-existence. So far it just seems that the "facts" depend on what website or media source you get your information from. I'm not convinced yet. All of this does give me a headache though. I don't trust politics in general. It's hard to know which side is willing to manipulate you more sometimes. lol. It's possible all of this is a very elaborate fabrication. The pictures are definitely real. I've seen the emails that have been corroborated by multiple people but admittedly those could be fabricated. The pictures either came from a phone or computer though and could've potentially been nabbed by hackers but they definitely came from a hard drive somewhere lol. The biden campaign hasn't bothered to deny any of this except Joe saying he hasn't taken money from china. The media has continually walked back their narrative. They originally said the whole thing is just made up. Then they said it was Russian disinformation. Then they shifted to attempting to smear Giuliani with the borat scene. If this is all false, the establishment media and biden campaign have done a pretty terrible job at not looking like they are trying to cover something up <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:946471265] in Tucker Car... [t:79070574]...</cite> <quote>GunslingerGunsl posted... </cite> <quote>Wouldn't media bias be a good reason to question the legitimacy of a source? I'm still confused as to how any one person can stand by their belief so strongly without at least considering whether or not they have any confirmation bias. I'm not discounting the possibility of the truth of all these claims, but I think the burden of truth lies on the side that is claiming the existence of something rather than the non-existence. So far it just seems that the "facts" depend on what website or media source you get your information from. I'm not convinced yet. All of this does give me a headache though. I don't trust politics in general. It's hard to know which side is willing to manipulate you more sometimes. lol.</quote>It's possible all of this is a very elaborate fabrication. The pictures are definitely real. I've seen the emails that have been corroborated by multiple people but admittedly those could be fabricated. The pictures either came from a phone or computer though and could've potentially been nabbed by hackers but they definitely came from a hard drive somewhere lol. The biden campaign hasn't bothered to deny any of this except Joe saying he hasn't taken money from china. The media has continually walked back their narrative. They originally said the whole thing is just made up. Then they said it was Russian disinformation. Then they shifted to attempting to smear Giuliani with the borat scene. If this is all false, the establishment media and biden campaign have done a pretty terrible job at not looking like they are trying to cover something up </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1