LogFAQs > #946400265

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Straight males and females, would you choose to be homosexual if it was possible
LinkPizza 10/28/20 7:22:47 AM #204:	Ganstaz003 posted... I already get the 'female perspective' from non-sexual female partners like my mothers and sisters. That should be enough. May be I should've reworded this better: What can my sexual female partners provide me that my brothers or male friends couldn't? I can't think of anything. That wasnt what you asked at first. In that reply, you said, and nobody so far has been able to provide me one thing a female can provide me outside of sex that my male friends can't. You never said the female had to be a sexual partner. This is women is general. Especially since other may not have female family members or might not have time to call and find one in all cases... But if you want to go that far, you still havent provided anything a male can provide that a female cant. Because as I stated, all the BS you mentioned before is wrong... Ganstaz003 posted... And yes, males have more in common with each other than males and females overall, for the most part. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having segregated sports. Instead, everything would be mixed. Males vs females. But of course, the fact that males aren't allowed to face females in sports and vice versa, proves my point. Segregated sports means nothing, though. Thats for averages. And even then, I know people who would pick a female on their team instead of a male based on how they play. Even tennis has mixed. Maybe if they were more mixed sports, things could changed. Who knows? But that still proves nothing. Ive seen both men and women who were great at sports, or who sucker. Being a male or female doesnt decided if youre good or not. Being good at the sport does... I bet an all female sports team who actually plays and practices a sport could easily beat males who dont ever play the sport and are just bad at it. Though, according to you, that should be impossible. So it actually proves nothing. Ganstaz003 posted... And the fact that males numerically dominate females in certain fields and vice versa, proves that males and females aren't quite as similar as many people would want to believe they are. And there is nothing wrong with that! Again, thats wrong. The reason that could be is that they may look for different work. And because the people hiring can be sexist. Im on the Air Force. Ive seen many female doing jobs people would usually think are for men. And most of those females can end up Being way better. And they could end up being better than most people because they are trained to do their job. It has nothing to do with being a male or female. Its about being trained to do the job... Ganstaz003 posted... Be a more compettive sports partner. That seems pretty sexist. Because while I cant be 100%, Im pretty sure both Williams sisters could beat most of the men and women on this board in tennis. Not only that, whole men are On average bigger and such, that doesnt mean all women are just shit. Most can still get stronger or be better at many different things. Ganstaz003 posted... Have mutual understanding together of what it means to be a male We can both understand each other in a way a female could never understand me. Such as the needs of a male. Just because youre both males doesnt mean your needs are exactly the same. For example, I believe you said you were asexual, right? But Im not. My needs include sex. But if youre asexual, then your needs dont include that. In that case, my needs when it comes to sex are closer to a female who feels the same rather than you, who is also a male... Either way, I agreeing with adjl (I think), or whoever it was that said you just seem like a sexist... Because thats the vibe Im getting from your posts... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:946400265] in Straight m... [t:79056298]...</cite> <quote>Ganstaz003 posted...</cite> <quote>I already get the 'female perspective' from non-sexual female partners like my mothers and sisters. That should be enough. May be I should've reworded this better: What can my sexual female partners provide me that my brothers or male friends couldn't? I can't think of anything.</quote> That wasnt what you asked at first. In that reply, you said, and nobody so far has been able to provide me one thing a female can provide me outside of sex that my male friends can't. You never said the female had to be a sexual partner. This is women is general. Especially since other may not have female family members or might not have time to call and find one in all cases... But if you want to go that far, you still havent provided anything a male can provide that a female cant. Because as I stated, all the BS you mentioned before is wrong... Ganstaz003 posted...</cite> <quote>And yes, males have more in common with each other than males and females overall, for the most part. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having segregated sports. Instead, everything would be mixed. Males vs females. But of course, the fact that males aren't allowed to face females in sports and vice versa, proves my point.</quote> Segregated sports means nothing, though. Thats for averages. And even then, I know people who would pick a female on their team instead of a male based on how they play. Even tennis has mixed. Maybe if they were more mixed sports, things could changed. Who knows? But that still proves nothing. Ive seen both men and women who were great at sports, or who sucker. Being a male or female doesnt decided if youre good or not. Being good at the sport does... I bet an all female sports team who actually plays and practices a sport could easily beat males who dont ever play the sport and are just bad at it. Though, according to you, that should be impossible. So it actually proves nothing. Ganstaz003 posted...</cite> <quote>And the fact that males numerically dominate females in certain fields and vice versa, proves that males and females aren't quite as similar as many people would want to believe they are. And there is nothing wrong with that!</quote> Again, thats wrong. The reason that could be is that they may look for different work. And because the people hiring can be sexist. Im on the Air Force. Ive seen many female doing jobs people would usually think are for men. And most of those females can end up Being way better. And they could end up being better than most people because they are trained to do their job. It has nothing to do with being a male or female. Its about being trained to do the job... Ganstaz003 posted...</cite> <quote>Be a more compettive sports partner.</quote>That seems pretty sexist. Because while I cant be 100%, Im pretty sure both Williams sisters could beat most of the men and women on this board in tennis. Not only that, whole men are On average bigger and such, that doesnt mean all women are just shit. Most can still get stronger or be better at many different things. Ganstaz003 posted...</cite> <quote>Have mutual understanding together of what it means to be a male We can both understand each other in a way a female could never understand me. Such as the needs of a male.</quote> Just because youre both males doesnt mean your needs are exactly the same. For example, I believe you said you were asexual, right? But Im not. My needs include sex. But if youre asexual, then your needs dont include that. In that case, my needs when it comes to sex are closer to a female who feels the same rather than you, who is also a male... Either way, I agreeing with adjl (I think), or whoever it was that said you just seem like a sexist... Because thats the vibe Im getting from your posts... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1