LogFAQs > #946347018

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Amy Coney Barrett got confirmed
BlackScythe0 10/26/20 10:48:21 PM #34:	ssj4supervegeta posted... isn't it also fair to say that the democrats were totally in favour of obama appointing a justice during an election year, but now that someone they dont like is in office they're against it? almost like people want different rules in place at different times to suit what they think benefits them personally, rather than what is most fair. Wow that is some impressive mental gymnastics. Obama was denied his rightful pick, correct republicans kept spouting a bull shit rule. Where is that rule now? Either the sitting president can appoint a justice in an election year or they can't republicans can have it both ways but it's democrats who are somehow in the wrong here? <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:946347018] in Amy Coney ... [t:79065665]...</cite> <quote>ssj4supervegeta posted... </cite> <quote>isn't it also fair to say that the democrats were totally in favour of obama appointing a justice during an election year, but now that someone they dont like is in office they're against it? almost like people want different rules in place at different times to suit what they think benefits them personally, rather than what is most fair.</quote> Wow that is some impressive mental gymnastics. Obama was denied his rightful pick, correct republicans kept spouting a bull shit rule. Where is that rule now? Either the sitting president can appoint a justice in an election year or they can't republicans can have it both ways but it's democrats who are somehow in the wrong here? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1