LogFAQs > #946346805

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAmy Coney Barrett got confirmed
ssj4supervegeta
10/26/20 10:43:24 PM
#32:


argonautweakend posted...
I feel like increasing the court by two would make some sense, since in 2016 republicans refused to give Merrick Garland a hearing, using the reasoning of "no new justices in an election year" only to intentionally not have that reasoning follow suit when the same scenario happened 4 years later(which is to say, if that's the reasoning you wanna use, Ginsburg dying in September is a hell of a lot closer to election day than Scalia in February). All that and you still keep an odd number of justices.
isn't it also fair to say that the democrats were totally in favour of obama appointing a justice during an election year, but now that someone they dont like is in office they're against it? almost like people want different rules in place at different times to suit what they think benefits them personally, rather than what is most fair.

---
LoL summoner: Vejitables
Wanna know why me rogers so jolly? hehe
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1