LogFAQs > #946344439

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAmy Coney Barrett got confirmed
streamofthesky
10/26/20 9:46:36 PM
#18:


WTF? Hasn't it only been like 2 weeks?
Wow, they really don't give a shit about the will of the voters, didn't even bother to wait till the lame duck session after the election to just give America the middle finger.

argonautweakend posted...
I feel like increasing the court by two would make some sense, since in 2016 republicans refused to give Merrick Garland a hearing, using the reasoning of "no new justices in an election year" only to intentionally not have that reasoning follow suit when the same scenario happened 4 years later(which is to say, if that's the reasoning you wanna use, Ginsburg dying in September is a hell of a lot closer to election day than Scalia in February). All that and you still keep an odd number of justices.
Yup. They've stolen two seats now, so taking 2 back is bare minimum acceptable retaliation. Plus, you need to keep it an odd number anyway, like you said.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1