LogFAQs > #944498204

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	"Cuties": Conservatives/Q Anon continue to embarass themselves
SpiritSephiroth 09/11/20 8:46:08 PM #66:	creativerealms posted... So we should limit art if it can be interprated the wrong way by the wrong people? Now if the people involved are pedophiles that's different. How are arguments liie this any more valid then the stupid SJW comments about Joker potentially leading to imitation killings? Seems canceling is fine when it's something you disagree with. I'm not sure why I have to explain this. These are minors. What should minors not partake in? Any sexual activity. What should people not do? Exploit minors in a bid to put a message across. What have these people done? Used minors, sexually, to make a movie, that has even been given a rating that say minors themselves shouldn't watch as far as I know. If not even minors can watch a movie that contains minors partaking in sexual acts, does that mean theres a problem? I would think so. This is nothing comparable to Joker. Nothing in the Joker movie actually broke any laws. This movie probably did concerning children. Also cancelling a whole company or industry is totally different than cancelling one individual. And if a company has committed a crime such as, exploit minors sexually, then people need to point that out. --- https://imgtc.com/i/OAltYFG.gif https://imgtc.com/i/qTmQUCd.gif https://imgtc.com/i/Xdeqr0q.gif <cite>SpiritSephiroth posted [p:944498204] in "Cuti... [t:78969125]...</cite> <quote>creativerealms posted... </cite> <quote>So we should limit art if it can be interprated the wrong way by the wrong people? Now if the people involved are pedophiles that's different. How are arguments liie this any more valid then the stupid SJW comments about Joker potentially leading to imitation killings? Seems canceling is fine when it's something you disagree with.</quote> I'm not sure why I have to explain this. These are minors. What should minors not partake in? Any sexual activity. What should people not do? Exploit minors in a bid to put a message across. What have these people done? Used minors, sexually, to make a movie, that has even been given a rating that say minors themselves shouldn't watch as far as I know. If not even minors can watch a movie that contains minors partaking in sexual acts, does that mean theres a problem? I would think so. This is nothing comparable to Joker. Nothing in the Joker movie actually broke any laws. This movie probably did concerning children. Also cancelling a whole company or industry is totally different than cancelling one individual. And if a company has committed a crime such as, exploit minors sexually, then people need to point that out. --- https://imgtc.com/i/OAltYFG.gif https://imgtc.com/i/qTmQUCd.gif https://imgtc.com/i/Xdeqr0q.gif</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1