LogFAQs > #943788887

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAOC's grilling of Cohen led to NY AG's fraud case against Trump businesses, Eric
Alpha218
08/25/20 12:36:37 AM
#1:


https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/aocs-grilling-of-michael-cohen -was-what-led-to-ny-ags-fraud-case-against-trump-businesses-eric-trump/

New York States ongoing investigation into whether the Trump Organizationand President Donald Trump himselfcommitted wire fraud is the result of congressional testimony elicited from Michael Cohen by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in early 2019.

On Monday, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed renewed legal action against the 45th presidents businesses and his son, Eric Trump. The complaint requests that a state court force the defendants to comply with extant subpoenas demanding the release of sensitive financial information that may have been used to commit fraud. James also seek to compel Eric Trumps testimony.

On February 27, 2019, Cohen appeared before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform to provide long-awaited testimony of his own about alleged crimes committed by his former friend and employer. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez was the lower chambers standout interrogator during that widely-viewed session.

The Bronx-based, self-described democratic socialist asked Cohen questions regarding exactly what James is currently requesting a courts intervention to help obtain evidence of: alleged asset inflation to game insurance rates and property tax payments.

The exchange in question was just shy of 30 seconds:

AOC: To your knowledge, did the president ever provide inflated assets to an insurance company?
Cohen: Yes.
AOC: Who else knows that the president did this?
Cohen: Allen Weisselberg, Ron Lieberman and Matthew Calamari.
AOC: And where would the committee find more information on this? Do you think we need to review his financial statements and his tax returns in order to compare them?
Cohen: Yes. And youd find it at the Trump Org.

The language used by Ocasio-Cortez and Cohen about asset inflation directly tracks with New York States recently renewed inquiry.

According to a legal memo prepared by the attorney generals office to explain the statutory and precedential authority for enforcing those subpoenas in full, James is currently attempting to ascertain whether or not Trump and his various family businesses improperly inflated the value of assets on annual financial statements in order to secure loans and obtain economic and tax benefits.

James herself provided a clear-cut nexus between Ocasio-Cortezs line of questioning and her own investigation in a Monday press release.

New York Attorney General Letitia James this past Friday took legal action in an ongoing civil investigation into the Trump Organizations financial dealings, Jamess office said. Attorney General James opened an investigation into Donald Trump and the Trump Organization in 2019, after Trumps former lawyer, Michael Cohen, testified before Congress that Trumps annual financial statements inflated the values of Trumps assets to obtain favorable terms for loans and insurance coverage, while also deflating the value of other assets to reduce real estate taxes.

Notably, white collar criminal expert and federal defense attorney Tor Ekeland more or less predicted the precise impact of Ocasio-Cortezs questioning at the time.

Basically, the wire fraud statutes make it a federal crime to use any scheme or artifice to defraud if its done via any form of electronic communication like telephone, or the internet etc, he told Law&Crime in an interview. The important thing to note about the wire fraud and the bank fraud statutes is theyre extremely broad and you dont actually have to have succeeded in committing the fraud you were trying to initiate. The second youre communicating in interstate commercewith a telephone or email, the wires theyve got you.
Ekeland elaborated as to how it might apply in Trumps case:

"If hes inflating his assets to get a better insurance rate or whatever, hes using a scheme or artificewhich is the language of the statutethats arguably using a scheme or artifice to defraud the insurance company. Hes not just implicated in the substantive part of the statute but also the surrounding statutes like conspiracy to commit wire fraud, solicitation [to commit wire fraud] and maybe even accessory [to commit wire fraud] after the fact."



---
I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite user on the Citadel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_q8t4QHypeQ
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1