LogFAQs > #942545851

kangolcone posted...

Heres the problem. You interject truth (MK) with half truth (Dali Lama) and complete conjecture (Bourdain) alongside things that arent actually conspiracies.

I'll admit the Bourdian story isn't confirmed, but there's a lot going on in that story that very makes it very plausible. When you look at the sequence of events from when Wienstien got charged, the moment the MeToo movement trended, to when Bourdian killed himself, and the story of Argento's pedophilia appeared after.... especially in earlier stories about Wienstien when was quoted in saying that he has 'dirt' on many people in Hollywood; alluded to the notion that he could drop a lot of bombs if the trial moves forward.... It's a very very very VERY plausible theory, that Wienstien got his revenge on Asia for being the celebrity figurehead of MeToo....Bourdian's suicide was just collateral.

But "MK Ultra" is real, and the Dali Ilama is confirmed as well.

Now I'm not sure where you can actually say the others aren't conspiracies but you have to view those events in it's proper historical context.

Could you honestly believe, living in the 1950s, being told that smoking was "GOOD" for you; even by the Surgeon General (who was probably paid off by Philip Morris directly)..... only then lowly doctors are saying "Hey, we got people with lung cancer here, they got it from smoking!"..... but the "powers that be" are saying NONSENSE! And the America people in general are going "duhhhh, okay"....

Again, it's context. There was a time when EVERYONE thought smoking was harmless. But save for the few who actually proved it was bad. Those people at the time were shunned, and brushed aside for spreading "unfounded" facts, and dismissed as "conspiracy theorists".

Same with the Edward Snowden whistleblower. Everyone thought "Nahhhh, the America government doesn't spy on its people. Anyone thinking that is crazy and paranoid."......and now we know the truth, right?