LogFAQs > #942048764

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Is this post about Corona 1% mortality rate accurate?
YellowMustard69 07/13/20 10:23:09 AM #24:	Rebel_Patriot posted... Its called context. No one wants deaths, but shutting down the livelihoods of millions for something on par with the flu in terms of deaths, when nothing was shut down for the flu. Context matters. Thats why people bring it up. Economical, social, and cultural impacts should be considered before shutting things down. Thats why alcohol isnt banned, the deaths related to alcohol dont outweigh all those other factors. This is how I see it. We will know much more about the virus in years to come. Right now we don't have enough data to be certain of anything. The numbers I looked at were just from a study, which theorized a 0.66% death rate. I liked the study, but we are far from being conclusive on anything. As far as long term damage goes. How much are we talking? Like how much damage to the heart and lungs? The equivalent of smoking 40 cigarettes? 1000? What kind of comparisons do we have? What do we know <cite>YellowMustard69 posted [p:942048764] in Is this po... [t:78843465]...</cite> <quote>Rebel_Patriot posted... </cite> <quote>Its called context. No one wants deaths, but shutting down the livelihoods of millions for something on par with the flu in terms of deaths, when nothing was shut down for the flu. Context matters. Thats why people bring it up. Economical, social, and cultural impacts should be considered before shutting things down. Thats why alcohol isnt banned, the deaths related to alcohol dont outweigh all those other factors.</quote> This is how I see it. We will know much more about the virus in years to come. Right now we don't have enough data to be certain of anything. The numbers I looked at were just from a study, which theorized a 0.66% death rate. I liked the study, but we are far from being conclusive on anything. As far as long term damage goes. How much are we talking? Like how much damage to the heart and lungs? The equivalent of smoking 40 cigarettes? 1000? What kind of comparisons do we have? What do we know </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1