LogFAQs > #942047248

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Is this post about Corona 1% mortality rate accurate?
lurk 07/13/20 9:22:25 AM #21:	lww99 posted... Im not trying to argue the 1%. It could be 3%, could be 6%. Idk. what Im really asking is. IF its at 1%, do 59 million people really have permanent damage to their heart? probably not but we do know long term sufferers are real. 59 million probably isnt truem <cite>lurk posted [p:942047248] in Is this po... [t:78843465]...</cite> <quote>lww99 posted... </cite> <quote>Im not trying to argue the 1%. It could be 3%, could be 6%. Idk. what Im really asking is. IF its at 1%, do 59 million people really have permanent damage to their heart?</quote>probably not but we do know long term sufferers are real. 59 million probably isnt truem </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1