LogFAQs > #941951580

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	MGSV may have missed the mark narratively, but its gameplay is a 10/10
RedJackson 07/10/20 9:10:35 PM #19:	Smashingpmkns posted... The open world could have been completely removed imo but it was kinda cool how you could unknowingly complete a mission in the open world, then when you start the mission Miller and Ocelot are like wtf you already did this shit you fucker. Eh, disagree - they shouldve added complex military installations ala Ground Zeroes instead of this dumb, empty open world.. I also disagree with those who say less story was a better move because we actually received an awkward, badly paced story that.. didnt do anything? Even PO had a better story and that game actually connected you to the prisoners you captured. Overall I gave it a 6.5/10 and Im a huge fanboy of the MGS series.. but its just inexcusable imo. All the points are for gameplay because it was stellar fwiw. <cite>RedJackson posted [p:941951580] in MGSV may h... [t:78838477]...</cite> <quote>Smashingpmkns posted... </cite> <quote>The open world could have been completely removed imo but it was kinda cool how you could unknowingly complete a mission in the open world, then when you start the mission Miller and Ocelot are like wtf you already did this shit you fucker.</quote> Eh, disagree - they shouldve added complex military installations ala Ground Zeroes instead of this dumb, empty open world.. I also disagree with those who say less story was a better move because we actually received an awkward, badly paced story that.. didnt do anything? Even PO had a better story and that game actually connected you to the prisoners you captured. Overall I gave it a 6.5/10 and Im a huge fanboy of the MGS series.. but its just inexcusable imo. All the points are for gameplay because it was stellar fwiw. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1