LogFAQs > #939555936

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Google bans QAnon apps from PlayStore for 'harmful content'
YoukaiSlayer 05/22/20 4:04:35 PM #48:	RedPixel posted... Many of the posts make no sense, and later end up being validated through really weird and uncanny timestamp deltas. Really difficult to explain, but one second Q might post something, and exactly X seconds/minutes later someone high profile (as high as Trump) will post something relevant. Something that probability or discrete structures would otherwise deem mathematically impossible odds. Probability doesn't deem anything mathematically impossible unless it can't happen. You messed up your wording here. Timestamps mean very little about the accuracy of the information and when things become nonsensical you can make them fit almost any narritive. This is basically the same shit "psychics" use to convince people that they are predicting stuff when in reality it's just vague shit that applies to almost everything. Like lets look at "not everything will be clean". That could mean virtually anything. Virus. Nuclear weapons. Natural disaster. Political scandal. Environmental issue. What the chances that nothing having anything to do with any of those things happens for several years? Virtually zero. Of course not everything will run smoothly for ever, shit gets messed up all the time. RedPixel posted... and sometimes disinformation is necessary Lets look at this. Firstly, it would mean that if Qanon is right OR wrong, it supports your narrative. Secondly though, this implies that you are somehow smart enough to figure out what is or isn't disinformation but this elite deep state societal conspiracy that can somehow remain undetected for however long can't. Why would he share the information in the first place and let the "enemy" know he is onto them before being able to deal the fatal blow to their operation? It'd be like the police sending in an undercover agent to a gang and then running a news article about how they have undercover agents infiltrating the gang. It'd be complete idiocy. RedPixel posted... Maybe. But for the sake of optics, there are militaristic advantages to playing the idiot and letting the media waste their (finite) ammunition. He tricked Fauci into trying to play every side of the equation with masks vs no masks, at different times. I'm not claiming he's a mastermind, but he's more intelligent than he lets on. What imaged advantage could that possibly have provided? Hell, I could play the same card. Fauci is actually a mastermind genius and is just playing the fool. You've bought into a narrative that is supported by literally any possible action. If they are right or wrong about something, if they are smart or dumb, none of it matters with the way you've built it up in your head. You should be able to look at a situation and see two outcomes, one supporting your hypothesis, and the rest not supporting it, but you've tricked yourself into a situation where all outcomes possible would support your hypothesis, strengthening your belief in what is probably a hoax to the point of blind fanaticism. --- I'm ninja (you can't see me) <cite>YoukaiSlayer posted [p:939555936] in Google ban... [t:78710426]...</cite> <quote>RedPixel posted... </cite> <quote>Many of the posts make no sense, and later end up being validated through really weird and uncanny timestamp deltas. Really difficult to explain, but one second Q might post something, and exactly X seconds/minutes later someone high profile (as high as Trump) will post something relevant. Something that probability or discrete structures would otherwise deem mathematically impossible odds.</quote>Probability doesn't deem anything mathematically impossible unless it can't happen. You messed up your wording here. Timestamps mean very little about the accuracy of the information and when things become nonsensical you can make them fit almost any narritive. This is basically the same shit "psychics" use to convince people that they are predicting stuff when in reality it's just vague shit that applies to almost everything. Like lets look at "not everything will be clean". That could mean virtually anything. Virus. Nuclear weapons. Natural disaster. Political scandal. Environmental issue. What the chances that nothing having anything to do with any of those things happens for several years? Virtually zero. Of course not everything will run smoothly for ever, shit gets messed up all the time. RedPixel posted... </cite> <quote>and sometimes disinformation is necessary</quote>Lets look at this. Firstly, it would mean that if Qanon is right OR wrong, it supports your narrative. Secondly though, this implies that you are somehow smart enough to figure out what is or isn't disinformation but this elite deep state societal conspiracy that can somehow remain undetected for however long can't. Why would he share the information in the first place and let the "enemy" know he is onto them before being able to deal the fatal blow to their operation? It'd be like the police sending in an undercover agent to a gang and then running a news article about how they have undercover agents infiltrating the gang. It'd be complete idiocy. RedPixel posted... </cite> <quote>Maybe. But for the sake of optics, there are militaristic advantages to playing the idiot and letting the media waste their (finite) ammunition. He tricked Fauci into trying to play every side of the equation with masks vs no masks, at different times. I'm not claiming he's a mastermind, but he's more intelligent than he lets on.</quote>What imaged advantage could that possibly have provided? Hell, I could play the same card. Fauci is actually a mastermind genius and is just playing the fool. You've bought into a narrative that is supported by literally any possible action. If they are right or wrong about something, if they are smart or dumb, none of it matters with the way you've built it up in your head. You should be able to look at a situation and see two outcomes, one supporting your hypothesis, and the rest not supporting it, but you've tricked yourself into a situation where all outcomes possible would support your hypothesis, strengthening your belief in what is probably a hoax to the point of blind fanaticism. --- I'm ninja (you can't see me)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1