He says there is empathy on both sides of the lockdown ball. Red is choosing empathy for those who may possibly die to it while Sephy is talking about empathy towards those who may die to addiction, suicide, poverty, etc.
It is a fair debate that everyone should have and every governor should be weighing in their choices right now.
Then he sarcastically responds that empathy towards them shouldn't matter because high and mighty intellectual red deems it so and will save the world.
Like there is literally nothing wrong with this post. I mean, is the argument that him sarcastically calling red an intellectual was flaming? That is literally the closest you are going to get to a moderation with the post. Red's post clearly, while a flimsy moderation at best and one I wouldn't make, is more of a degree of flaming than Sephy's.
whats that saying about cutting out a mans tongue because you fear what he has to say