LogFAQs > #936550079

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Florida pastor arrested for following the First Amendment
dainkinkaide 03/31/20 4:58:49 PM #22:	Mr Hangman posted... These quarantine orders are all on very shaky ground legally. It might not be challenged in court because most people will follow them voluntarily, and if it is challenged it might simply be dropped once the orders are lifted. But if it goes on for any length of time, there will be serious questions about the civil rights ramifications and what constitutional authority, if any, these orders are derived from. Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905). Admittedly, this case was regarding whether or not it violated the Constitution to require people to get vaccinated against smallpox by force of law during the smallpox epidemic, but Justice Harlan and 6 other SCOTUS Justices came to the conclusion that it fell well within a state's police powers to use reasonable regulations regarding restraints on Constitutional rights to protect public health in the face of an epidemic. --- The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns. <cite>dainkinkaide posted [p:936550079] in Florida pa... [t:78525392]...</cite> <quote>Mr Hangman posted... </cite> <quote>These quarantine orders are all on very shaky ground legally. It might not be challenged in court because most people will follow them voluntarily, and if it is challenged it might simply be dropped once the orders are lifted. But if it goes on for any length of time, there will be serious questions about the civil rights ramifications and what constitutional authority, if any, these orders are derived from.</quote>Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905). Admittedly, this case was regarding whether or not it violated the Constitution to require people to get vaccinated against smallpox by force of law during the smallpox epidemic, but Justice Harlan and 6 other SCOTUS Justices came to the conclusion that it fell well within a state's police powers to use reasonable regulations regarding restraints on Constitutional rights to protect public health in the face of an epidemic. --- The problem with the internet today is that it's filled with entire generations that did not grow up with the great wisdom of the Wyld Stallyns.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1