LogFAQs > #936396005

LinkPizza posted...

Normally, they aren't ruined by a couple on tenants not paying a month's rent. That's literally why at the very beginning it was said that they were a bad landlord if missing one month's rent would ruin them. That was the whole point. I never said they were bad if they couldn't make it a year of 6 months. They discussion from the beginning was if they couldn't miss a month's rent, they were bad one. Check post #20. That was my first post in the topic... If you're looking at more than one month, that's you. That's not what I was doing... But I was talking about an extending period of time. I don't know why you would think that I was. So, does think mean you agree? I never said they were a bad landlord if they. could pay a few months with rent. I said I agreed that they were a bad landlord if they would be ruined by missing one month of rent...

Hey, fair enough. But it starts with one month. That doesn't mean the land lord doesn't lose valuable, important income from one month or that they should just let it go because times are rough. They still have a responsibility to demand payment from the tenants they provide housing for.

If they just let it slide, the tenants will learn to abuse it.