LogFAQs > #936324957

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	NYPD cop plants marijuana in civilians car then says "it's lit"
Artemis86 03/27/20 1:58:37 PM #185:	marc55 posted... oh you are the type to twist and even add words to other people posts and woah you added a lot Your barely-coherent posts required interpretation, that isn't my fault. marc55 posted... they found texts on his phone and its odd the video doesnt start showing the cops is too far from the cops and the guy on floor there is something the one who edited that video didnt want people to see "Too far away" implies distance, I have never seen someone use it to describe pointing away from something. And that's only reallu aside from having to decipher whatever the hell that comment was. Ooh, look, you said it was edited and never addressed that I pointed out it was a continuous clip. Shocker. marc55 posted... lying ? the video does start away from the cops why was aiming that far off? Again, you can't explain things AT ALL. "Away from the cops" implies distance, not direction, and honestly your sentences are so poorly constructed that I figured "aiming" was just poor word choice. marc55 posted... unless really have to be closer to aim your phone a bit to the right Oh, so you arent smearing a private citizen for staying too far away, you're smearing them for not being professional photojournalists with crystal-clear images and rocksteady camera discipline. Shaky cam and not having 100% coverage makes it fake right? I see you backed off from your "it's edited" claim entirely now. But hey, it may be entirely in bad faith, but let's address that too. Ever wonder why filming was happening in the first place? Could it be that the cops announced that they "found" drugs on him? That camera wasnt pointing at some random place either, it was on the suspect's car, where you would look if someone announced drugs were found on the scene. Now that I've answered your objections, how about answering these questions? - someone said the cop's own body cam caught him planting drugs. Were all the cameras in on it? -why would you attempt to chase down a citizen not suspected of a crime who isnt interfering with police? Why the look of panic when he finds out he's being recorded? -why was the baggy (ok, baggies) taken out of a pocket and placed by hand without gloves? That would 100% contaminate the hell out of it and any fingerprints on it may be lost. Why isn't it in another baggy to preserve its integrity as evidence? -What is the "reasonable explanation" for all this highly incriminating activity? Is your entire argument seriously going to hinge on the two seconds it wasn't facing them? Gonna attack the camera shakiness next? She didn't keep it trained on the cop while fleeing, so fake? Didnt film horizontal, therefore they are hiding something? Figured I'd pre-emptively eliminate the next excuses you could make. <cite>Artemis86 posted [p:936324957] in NYPD cop p... [t:78507472]...</cite> <quote>marc55 posted... </cite> <quote>oh you are the type to twist and even add words to other people posts and woah you added a lot</quote> Your barely-coherent posts required interpretation, that isn't my fault. marc55 posted... </cite> <quote>they found texts on his phone and its odd the video doesnt start showing the cops is too far from the cops and the guy on floor there is something the one who edited that video didnt want people to see</quote> "Too far away" implies distance, I have never seen someone use it to describe pointing away from something. And that's only reallu aside from having to decipher whatever the hell that comment was. Ooh, look, you said it was edited and never addressed that I pointed out it was a continuous clip. Shocker. marc55 posted... </cite> <quote>lying ? the video does start away from the cops why was aiming that far off?</quote>Again, you can't explain things AT ALL. "Away from the cops" implies distance, not direction, and honestly your sentences are so poorly constructed that I figured "aiming" was just poor word choice. marc55 posted... </cite> <quote> unless really have to be closer to aim your phone a bit to the right</quote>Oh, so you arent smearing a private citizen for staying too far away, you're smearing them for not being professional photojournalists with crystal-clear images and rocksteady camera discipline. Shaky cam and not having 100% coverage makes it fake right? I see you backed off from your "it's edited" claim entirely now. But hey, it may be entirely in bad faith, but let's address that too. Ever wonder why filming was happening in the first place? Could it be that the cops announced that they "found" drugs on him? That camera wasnt pointing at some random place either, it was on the suspect's car, where you would look if someone announced drugs were found on the scene. Now that I've answered your objections, how about answering these questions? - someone said the cop's own body cam caught him planting drugs. Were all the cameras in on it? -why would you attempt to chase down a citizen not suspected of a crime who isnt interfering with police? Why the look of panic when he finds out he's being recorded? -why was the baggy (ok, baggies) taken out of a pocket and placed by hand without gloves? That would 100% contaminate the hell out of it and any fingerprints on it may be lost. Why isn't it in another baggy to preserve its integrity as evidence? -What is the "reasonable explanation" for all this highly incriminating activity? Is your entire argument seriously going to hinge on the two seconds it wasn't facing them? Gonna attack the camera shakiness next? She didn't keep it trained on the cop while fleeing, so fake? Didnt film horizontal, therefore they are hiding something? Figured I'd pre-emptively eliminate the next excuses you could make. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1