LogFAQs > #934041636

I'm putting my neck on the line here. I've been a very good poster and I've had a good run with this account, but it's to the point where any political post I make gets me put on Warning. This time it truly went too far and I need to speak up. @SBAllen

I was put on Warning because I agreed with a post saying that what Trump did was not impeachable, and that Obama did the same thing.

Again, just to reiterate, I was given a WARNING for agreeing with what the Senate officially ruled. Thats absolutely unreal. Of course I appealed it, and of course they just upheld it with no explanation. In fact, there wasnt any reason given for the moderation in the first place. Just the word Trolling with nothing whatsoever to back it up.
So what about this post was trolling? Was it that its not an impeachable offense, or that Obama did it?

Obama literally did know about the corruption of Burisma. Take a look at this story:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/george-kent-tells-lawmakers-he-was-told-lay-low-after-n1067056

Specifically pay attention to this part at the end:

During his nearly 10 hours of testimony, Kent also told members of Congress and their staff that Burisma, the energy company where Hunter Biden was a board member, was corrupt, according to a separate person who was present in the room. Kent said he told the Obama administration in 2016 that they should not hold an event with Burisma because of the companys extensive corruption in Ukraine.

This is coming from the State Department. We had been investigating them in America for a long time, and wanted Ukraine to cooperate.

In fact, former US ambassador to Ukraine testified that the Obama administration prepped her specifically about Hunter Biden being on Burismas board of directors because they were so concerned about the position.

https://nypost.com/2019/11/15/marie-yovanovitch-admits-obama-admin-prepped-her-on-hunter-biden-before-her-confirmation/

Nothing about my post (or the post I was agreeing with) was trolling. These are simply stating facts, that Obama was investigating Burisma, and the phone call was not impeachable, and its a heavy abuse of power to put me on Warning for simply agreeing with a factual post.

Now what I think this might really be about, and a source of even more problems, is that the mods wanted revenge on me for the topic I made about Rush Limbaugh. I posted the breaking news that he announced his lung cancer, and many people said hateful things that they got warned or suspended for, as I understand it.

I didnt mark anybody. It was not my intention to bait anyone. But the way the actual rules on this website are, the moderators had to bite their tongue and take their pound of flesh for those hateful posts. So now they wanted to get me back for it, and they went for the most asinine thing they possibly could.

The chatter about mod abuses has become worse than I've ever seen it, and people who speak up tend to just get whacked, so we're seeing a chilling effect in the discourse. This needs to be addressed now.

---

He/Him/His