LogFAQs > #933693980

So
HanOfTheNekos posted...

Didn't target Ben because it didn't account for the variable of Ben being Scum. Let's say I target Ben - if he came up dirty, then that would mean he could determine what the result was. If it came up clean, once again, he could decide the narrative.

For example - Two Scum left. Scum Psychic and ???. ??? targets Ben on purpose, knowing both me and MZero are targeting Ben. Ben comes up dirty. We end up lynching MZero, who is the only other person Ben said targeted him. Either MZero is Scum and this is a sac move to make Ben look good, or it's a play, and MZero flips Town and then Ben pushes a ML on me and Scum wins.

Or Ben is Town and I missed my chance to tell us decidedly if MZero was Town or Scum.

Too many variables.

MZero was most likely targeting Ben, so I figured it'd be better to just go with the play that could confirm more decidedly on Ben.

You didn't trust Mzero's scan to already provide enough info on me???

How does scum me control the narrative with a clean scan? And me controlling a dirty scan relies on scum having another role that actually can visit a buddy. Also in your theory, scum team is visiting me, so wtf does targeting Mzero accomplish?


---

http://misereetcordes.free.fr/images/signature_ben.gif