LogFAQs > #933337130

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	California considering listing Tylenol as a carcinogen
brestugo 01/22/20 5:40:11 PM #22:	Prop 65 only requires the listing of known carcinogens. It doesn't ban anything. If something is a known carcinogen, the consumer has a right to know of its presence. --- It's not about the size of the dog in the fight, it's about the size of the fight in the dog. <cite>brestugo posted [p:933337130] in California... [t:78349604]...</cite> <quote>Prop 65 only requires the listing of known carcinogens. It doesn't ban anything. If something is a known carcinogen, the consumer has a right to know of its presence. --- It's not about the size of the dog in the fight, it's about the size of the fight in the dog.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1