LogFAQs > #933323846

"youre changing your argument"
me:*highlights my first post on the matter and points to how my argument has literally remained the same*

you: "why one developer get pass and other not?"
me: "game"

ive said multiple times if square were delaying a good game, then i wouldnt mind. so this:

Whether or not Square delayed the game, you still would be shitting on it because your mind is already made up.

its not too wrong. i was shitting on the game before it was delayed. this highlights the fact that my focus has been on the game.

a delayed game is good

as ive said, ff7r wont be good. thats the issue ive had. this delay won't change that. the only thing they can add at this point is some polish.

yes, it's semantics. it's okay to be wrong. it's clear youve already conceded my points in your heart but youre trying to save face and refuse to do that here. its clear it goes beyond shilling. you asked a stupid question and were given an answer that highlighted your ignorance of the matter was and can't cope with the fact.

furthermore, you feeling you need to attack my grammar and punctuation is a show of that. textbook deflection. you say you arent arguing semantics yet you double down and shift focus to that? its the internet dude. theres no need to be so formal or take things so seriously, so ill continue to type however i please.