LogFAQs > #933305326

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Are trans girls in the same category as cis girls in your mind?
MarqueeSeries 01/22/20 12:30:10 AM #119:	Solid Snake07 posted... MarqueeSeries posted... No, generally if you're gonna be taken seriously, you need to use the correct terminology. You're more than free to speak on things you clearly aren't educated about, but everyone else is also free to point that out and discredit you That would make sense if anything I said was wrong. A man who transitions to a woman is not a biological female and a woman who transitions to a man isnt a biological male. You can play buzzword semantics all you want to but it is what it is. You can identify yourself as whatever you want, wear whatever you want, and date whoever you want for all I care. More power to you and if I know your personally I'll address you as whatever pronoun you want me to. But you dont get to demand the rest of the world distorts perceptive reality to appease your self identification. That's some of the most narcissistic shit I've ever heard. And the worst thing about is is most trans people I know aren't like that. They're just normal people who dont want to be fucked with. This isn't about self identification. Labeling it as such is a massive discredit to trans people and is a pretty dead giveaway that you dont know what the fuck you're talking about averagejoel posted... Solid Snake07 posted... That would make sense if anything I said was wrong. A man who transitions to a woman is not a biological female and a woman who transitions to a man isnt a biological male. You can play buzzword semantics all you want to but it is what it is. how are you defining "biological female" and "biological male" here? "biological" is extremely imprecise. what specific physical or chemical characteristics are you deeming necessary in order for a person to be considered a "biological" male or female? chromosomes? gametes? hormones? secondary traits? Actually, I'm a little curious about this too. We've got hormone replacement therapy. Physical surgeries. Gene editing quickly progressing. The transition process is becoming more and more thorough, so where do you draw the line for someone being "biologically" male or female, preferably without using the words "born as a ____" --- A hunter is a hunter...even in a dream <cite>MarqueeSeries posted [p:933305326] in Are trans ... [t:78337414]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted...</cite> <quote> MarqueeSeries posted... </cite> <quote> No, generally if you're gonna be taken seriously, you need to use the correct terminology. You're more than free to speak on things you clearly aren't educated about, but everyone else is also free to point that out and discredit you </quote> That would make sense if anything I said was wrong. A man who transitions to a woman is not a biological female and a woman who transitions to a man isnt a biological male. You can play buzzword semantics all you want to but it is what it is. You can identify yourself as whatever you want, wear whatever you want, and date whoever you want for all I care. More power to you and if I know your personally I'll address you as whatever pronoun you want me to. But you dont get to demand the rest of the world distorts perceptive reality to appease your self identification. That's some of the most narcissistic shit I've ever heard. And the worst thing about is is most trans people I know aren't like that. They're just normal people who dont want to be fucked with. </quote> This isn't about self identification. Labeling it as such is a massive discredit to trans people and is a pretty dead giveaway that you dont know what the fuck you're talking about averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted... </cite> <quote> That would make sense if anything I said was wrong. A man who transitions to a woman is not a biological female and a woman who transitions to a man isnt a biological male. You can play buzzword semantics all you want to but it is what it is.</quote>how are you defining "biological female" and "biological male" here? "biological" is extremely imprecise. what specific physical or chemical characteristics are you deeming necessary in order for a person to be considered a "biological" male or female? chromosomes? gametes? hormones? secondary traits? </quote> Actually, I'm a little curious about this too. We've got hormone replacement therapy. Physical surgeries. Gene editing quickly progressing. The transition process is becoming more and more thorough, so where do you draw the line for someone being "biologically" male or female, preferably without using the words "born as a ____" --- A hunter is a hunter...even in a dream</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1