LogFAQs > #933212101

The_Scarecrow posted...

"It's not a full game b-because I say so!"

So that's your argument? How laughable. If Square Enix consider the remake to be a full game, you cannot argue that despite your own personal feelings. You may have that opinion and that's fine but it is not fact so stop acting like it is. This may be a brand new concept to you but you have to stay as objective as possible when debating these types of things.

I'll ask you one more time to actually address my point, okay? Why is it okay for one developer to delay a game but it is not okay for another developer to delay a game? Answer the question. To be honest, I already know what you want to say. I just want to see you say it so we can end this.

more like it's not a full game because it ends at midgar which is only 15% of ff7. square has acknowledged this to be everything but a full game considering they're calling it part 1. you know what a part is right? a part is not a whole.

"we're going to delay this game to ensure you get a fully finished project"
*releases game that can be played beginning to end* = okay

"we're going to delay this game to ensure you get a fully finished product"
*releases 15% of a game that can't be played to completion until 10 years have passed and every other part is released*

to answer your question

Why is it okay for one developer to delay a game but it is not okay for another developer to delay a game?

one game will be good. the other won't. this has nothing to do with developers so you can stop shilling for square. if they made me wait for good complete product id give them the same pass im giving cdpr. delays happen in the industry all the time. the key thing to look at is what's being delayed. not who's delaying it. stop being so fucking dense