LogFAQs > #932986053

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	As a refresher, here's the 2015 X-stats.
KamikazePotato 01/15/20 7:55:52 PM #41:	TsunamiXXVIII posted... Yeah, I was wondering about the methodology for these adjustments. The fact that even after adjusting, ME3 > ME2 seems odd. I've never played any of them but I heard the general consensus was 2 > 1 > 3 It's been too long since I did the adjustments to remember exactly how I did it, but it usually involves a lot of cross-referencing (and at times, a bit of guesswork) to get stats that eliminate the effects of SFFs, rallies, bandwagons ect. It's as good as you're going to get considering 1/4 of the bracket was trashed by rally spillover. ME3's stat specifically is worthless because it faced Undertale in Round 1, and ME2 just didn't do well. ME1 ranked above it as well. --- Black Turtle did a pretty good job. <cite>KamikazePotato posted [p:932986053] in As a refre... [t:78328466]...</cite> <quote>TsunamiXXVIII posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah, I was wondering about the methodology for these adjustments. The fact that even after adjusting, ME3 > ME2 seems odd. I've never played any of them but I heard the general consensus was 2 > 1 > 3</quote>It's been too long since I did the adjustments to remember exactly how I did it, but it usually involves a lot of cross-referencing (and at times, a bit of guesswork) to get stats that eliminate the effects of SFFs, rallies, bandwagons ect. It's as good as you're going to get considering 1/4 of the bracket was trashed by rally spillover. ME3's stat specifically is worthless because it faced Undertale in Round 1, and ME2 just didn't do well. ME1 ranked above it as well. --- Black Turtle did a pretty good job.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1